Improving Experiment Project Evaluation through Web-based Self- and Peer Assessment
PROCEEDINGS
Chen-Shan Lin, Kuo-En Chang, Chee-Lung Lee, Yao-Ting Sung, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-44-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
This study explores the application effects of self- and peer assessment from two aspects: combining evaluation and instruction, and facilitating learning with evaluation. In the aspect of combining the instruction process with self- and peer assessment, this study attempts to incorporate the Web technology into the self- and peer assessment procedure, and then to make it a part of the instruction activity. With respect to facilitating learning through evaluation, we attempt to combine self assessment, peer assessment and peer interaction to facilitate the occurrence of learning. The results of this study indicate that the Web-based self- and peer assessing activities could be successfully incorporated into classroom instruction. Moreover, the discussion among peers over their opinions and feelings about the observation and assessment results helps consensus-building among participants in evaluation and improves the objectiveness of their assessment.
Citation
Lin, C.S., Chang, K.E., Lee, C.L. & Sung, Y.T. (2002). Improving Experiment Project Evaluation through Web-based Self- and Peer Assessment. In D. Willis, J. Price & N. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2002--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2432-2434). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/17710/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page.
- Cizek, G. J. (1997). Learning, achievement, and assessment: Constructs at a crossroad. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment. New York: Academic Press.
- Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, 287-322.
- Gipps, C. V. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. In P.D. Pearson & A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 24, pp. 355-392). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
- Greeno,J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and Learning. In Berliner, D. C., & Calfee, R. C. (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Prentice Hall.
- Greeno, J.G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26 , 5-17.
- Hughes, I. E., & Large, B. J. (1993). Staff and peer- group assessment of oral communication skills. Studies in Higher Education, 18(3), 379-385.
- McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Educational psychology, social constructivism, and educational practice: A case of emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 36, 133-140.
- Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345-375. Paris, S., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89-101. Saavedra, R., & Kwun. S. K. (1993). Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 450-462. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29, 4-14.
- Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self- evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382.
- Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References