Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Journals > JILR > Volume 12, Issue 1 >

An Epistemological Framework for Analyzing Student Interactions in Computer-Mediated Communication Environments

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

GAY, G., Pena-Shaff, J. & MARTIN, W. (2001). An Epistemological Framework for Analyzing Student Interactions in Computer-Mediated Communication Environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(1), 41-68. Norfolk, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/8459.

OpenURL Link

Journal Information

JILR

Journal of Interactive Learning Research
ISSN 1093-023X
Volume 12, Issue 1, 2001
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)  Norfolk, VA

More Information on JILR

Table of Contents


Authors

GERALDINE GAY, Cornell University, USA; Judith Pena-Shaff, Ithaca College, USA; WENDY MARTIN, Cornell University, USA

Abstract

As applications of computer-mediated communication (CMC) become more accepted for teaching, educators will need to under-stand the strengths and constraints of the diverse media that can support or impede learning and communication. The case study in this article examines communication patterns and learning pro-cesses of students who used two forms of mediated communica-tion to discuss class topics: an asynchronous electronic bulletin board (BBS) and a synchronous text chat environment, Internet Relay Chat (IRC). Most of the discussions in the BBS environ-ment were well structured and developed. However, very few students had what can be considered genuine interactions with peers. The postings on the BBS resembled private arguments and analyses about an issue posted to a public bulletin board. In contrast, the IRC discussions showed more collaboration, social interaction, and conflict. However, students spent more time so-cializing than focusing on the task at hand. Results suggest that the BBS may be a useful tool for promoting critical thinking skills and reflective thought, although strategies need to be de-signed to increase students' interactions. Environments such as chat, used for specific discussion tasks, may be a good forum for idea-generation and immediate feedback, but do not encourage re-flective thought.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.