R2D2: A Constructivist/Interpretivist Instructional Design Model
PROCEEDINGS
Muktha B. Jost, Polly Mumma, Jerry Willis, Iowa State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, ISBN 978-1-880094-33-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
Until recently the great majority of instructional design (ID) models have relied on behavioral and information processing theories (Dick, 1996). There is, however, a growing body of literature on the practice of instructional design from a constructivist perspective (Winn, 1992). Much of this literature has emphasized the types of learning environments that can be developed such as anchored instruction or problem-based learning (Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, 1993; Wilson, 1996; Lin, Bransford, Hmelo, Kantor, Hickey, Secules, Petrosino, Goldman, and the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, 1995; Reigeluth, 1996, 1997). In 1995 I described the first version of an instructional design model based on constructivist instructional and learning theories and an interpretivist philosophy of science (Willis, 1995). It was developed during work at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston and at the Center for Information Technology in Education at the University of Houston. The model, named Recursive and Reflective Design and Development (R2D2), was one of the first to lay out in some detail an approach to creating instructional material that was based on constructivist theory. This paper, which is based on work at Iowa State University, describes a revision of the R2D2 model and discuss some of the practical issues involved in using an ID model.
Citation
Jost, M.B., Mumma, P. & Willis, J. (1999). R2D2: A Constructivist/Interpretivist Instructional Design Model. In J. Price, J. Willis, D. Willis, M. Jost & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 1999--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1489-1494). Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8201/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Blomberg, J., Giacomi, J., Mosher, A., & Swenton-Wall, P. (1993). Ethnographic field methods and their relationship to design. In D. Schuler & A. Namoika (Eds.), Participatory design: Principles and practices (pp. 123-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
- Bing, J., Flannelly, S., Hutton, M., and Kochlany, S. (1997). A-maze: An Instructional Design Model. Available: http://www.nova.edu/~kochlany/Id3.html
- Bodker, S., Gronbaek, J., and Kyng, M. (1991). Cooperative Design: Techniques and Experiences from the Scandinavian Scene. In R. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. Buxton, and S. Greenberg, (Eds.), Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman. Braden, R. (1996, March-April). The case for linear instructional design and development: A commentary on models, challenges, and myths. Educational Technology, 36(2), 5-23.
- Cennamo, K., Abell, S. And Chung, M. (1996). A “layers of negotiation” model ofr designing constructivist learning materials. Educational Technology, 36(4), 39-48.
- Dick, W. (1996). The Dick and Carey Model: Will It Survive the Decade. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 55-63.
- Good, M. (1991). Participatory design of a portable torque-feedback devise. In R. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. Buxton, and S. Greenberd (Eds), Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000, (pp. 225-232). San Francisco:
- Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1995). Instructional design and development of learning communities: An invitation to dialogue. Educational Technology, 53-63.
- Reigeluth, C. (1997). What Is the New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. IT Forum Paper #17. Available: http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/ITFORUM/paper17/papger17.html.
- Reigeluth, C. (1996). A new paradigm of ISD? Educational Technology, 36(3), 13-20.
- Robinson, J. (1997). Robinson’s Jigsaw Instructional Design Model. Available: http://fcae.nova.edu/~robint/ID_3.html
- Salomon, G. (1991). A Case Study in Interface Design.. In R. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. Buxton, and S. Greenberd (Eds), Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000, (pp. 223-33). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
- Santa Fe College. (1997). Willisís Instructional Design Processes (R2D2). Available: HYPERLINK http://wwwhealth.santafe.cc.fl.us/rc/idsat/ _ http://www-health.santafe.cc.fl.us/rc/idsat/
- Schon, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
- Schuler, D. And Namoika, A. (1993). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Tessmer, M. And Wedman, J. (1990). A layers-of-necessity instructional development model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(2), 77-85.
- Thoreson, K. (1991). Principles in Practice: Two Cases of Situated Participatory Design. In D. Schuler and A. Namoika (Eds), Participatory Design: Principles and Practices (pp. 271-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Winn, W. (1992). The assumptions of constructivism and instructional design. In T. Duffy and Jonassen, D. (Eds.). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation, (177-182). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- You, Y. (1994). What can we learn from chaos theory? An alternative approach to instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 17-32.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
The R2D2 Model for Effective Online Teaching and Enjoyable Online Learning
Ke Zhang, Wayne State University, United States; Curtis J. Bonk, Indiana University, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (October 2006) pp. 1547–1553
-
The R2D2 Model of Online Instruction: A Mapping Out of the Components
Curtis J. Bonk, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States; Ke Zhang, Texas Tech University, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2006 (June 2006) pp. 2010–2015
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.