Scoping and Sequencing Educational Resources and Speech Acts: A Unified Design Framework for Learning Objects and Educational Discourse
ARTICLE
David Wiley, Sandie Waters, Utah State University, United States
IJELLO Volume 1, Number 1, ISSN 1552-2237 Publisher: Informing Science Institute
Abstract
Instructional design is largely a matter of scope and sequence, and designing instruction with learning objections is no exception. Traditionally, learning objects are considered atomic units of educational content, and designing instruction with learning objects means scoping instructional messages and determining sequences for delivering the messages. We argue that instructional methods that rely heavily on social interaction can be implemented with learning objects when these are understood to be reusable scaffolds for scoping and sequencing what learners say to each other during instructional interactions.
Citation
Wiley, D. & Waters, S. (2005). Scoping and Sequencing Educational Resources and Speech Acts: A Unified Design Framework for Learning Objects and Educational Discourse. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 1(1), 143-150. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/44872/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Barritt, C., & Lewis, D. (2001). Reusable learning object strategy. Retrieved July 23, 2001, from http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/elearning/learn/whitepaper_docs/rlo_strategy_v31.pdf
- Carr-Chellman, A.A. (1995). Power, expertism, and the practice of instructional design: Empowering the users. In G.J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present and future (2nd ed.). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
- Carr-Chellman, A.A. (2000). Power, expertism, and the practice of instructional design: Empowering the users. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology, Denver, CO. Fle3. (2003). Fle3 > Future Learning Environment. Retrieved December 10, 2003, from http://fle3.uiah.fi/ Giunti Interactive Labs. (2003). The X learning Company. Retrieved December 10, 2003, from http://www.giuntilabs.com/
- Gunawardena, C.N., Lowe, C.A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
- Hakkarainen, K. (1998). Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto, Canada.
- Kunz, W., & Rittel, H. (1970). Issues as elements of information systems (Working Paper 131). Center for Planning and Development Research, The University of California at Berkeley, CA. L'Allier, J.J. (1998). NETg's precision skilling: The linking of occupational skills descriptors to training interventions. Retrieved April 2, 2001, from http://www.netg.com/research/pskillpaper.htm
- Merrill, M.D. (2000). Knowledge objects and mental models. Retrieved July 23, 2001, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/merrill.doc Merrill, M.D. (2001). First principles of instruction. Retrieved September 30, 2003, from http://www.id2.usu.edu/Papers/5FirstPrinciples.PDF
- OutStart. (2003). OutStart: Enabling Enterprise Learning. Retrieved December 10, 2003, from http://www.outstart.com/default.asp Reigeluth, C.M. (1992). Elaborating the elaboration theory. Educational Technology Research& Development, 40(3).
- Reigeluth, C.M., Merrill, M.D., Wilson, B.G., & Spiller, R.T. (1980). The elaboration theory of instruction: A model for structuring instruction. Instructional Science, 9(3), 195-219.
- Toulmin, S. (1959). The uses of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
- Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
- Wiley, D.A. (2000). Learning object design and sequencing theory: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University.
- Wiley, D.A., & Edwards, E.K. (2002). Online self-organizing social systems: The decentralized future of online learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education. Biography Dr. David Wiley is Director of the Center for Open and Sustainable
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Learning Objects and E-Learning: an Informing Science Perspective
Eli Cohen, Informing Science Institute, United States; Malgorzata Nycz, Wroclaw University of Economics, Poland
Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Vol. 2, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2006) pp. 23–34
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.