Login or register for free to remove ads.

Interaction effects of Hypervideo Navigation Variables in College Students' Self-Regulated Learning ARTICLE

, Helwan University, Egypt

Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Volume 22, Number 2, ISSN 1055-8896 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


The purpose of this study is to investigate the question of whether the interaction effects of hypervideo navigation variables (navigation control and navigation links) would affect college students’ self-regulated learning just after their learning from instructional hypervideo programs. Navigation control (free navigation or free navigation with advisement) and navigation links (video-based links or video/text-based links) were independent variables in this 2x2 factorial design quantitative study. Instructional content was the same in four experimental treatments: FN/VbL environment (free navigation via video-based links); FN/VTbL environment (free navigation via video/text-based links); FNwA/VbL environment (free navigation with advisement via video-based links); and FNwA/VTbL environment (free navigation with advisement via video/text-based links. Participants in the study were (60) pre-service teachers randomly assigned to one of the four experimental groups. Data analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses derived from research questions. Two-way ANOVA test was used to investigate the main effects of the two independent variables on the ten (10) separate self-regulated learning strategies, and on the overall self-regulated learning strategies (SRL). This study provided statistical evidence that free navigation fosters 100% of the separate and overall self- regulated strategies without the need for advisement at all; that VbL fosters about (91%) of the separate and overall self regulated strategies; and that no effects were found for the interaction between the two independent variables in terms of 7 separate strategies and the overall strategies.


Azmy, N. (2013). Interaction effects of Hypervideo Navigation Variables in College Students' Self-Regulated Learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 22(2), 113-146. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.



  1. Ainley, M., & Patrick, L. (2006). Measuring self-regulated learning processes through tracking patterns of student interaction with achievement activities. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 267-286.
  2. Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199209.
  3. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523535.
  4. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370.
  5. Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45-72.
  6. Bateman, W. E., & Harvey, F. A. (1998). Hypermedia Navigation: Where do we go from here? Proceedings of the National Convention of the Association for Educatioal Communication and Technology, (pp. 11-20).
  7. Bernstein, M. (1991). The navigation problem reconsidered. In E. Berk & J. Delvin (Eds.). Hypertext/hypermedia handbook (pp. 285-297). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  8. Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, 18, 199210.
  9. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199231.
  10. Borkowski, J.G., Carr, M., & Pressley,M. (1987). “Spontaneous” strategy use: Perspectives from metacognitive theory. Intelligence, 11, 61-75.
  11. Burke, P. A., Etnier, J. L., & Sullivan, H. J. (1998). Navigational Aids and Learner Control in Hypermedia Instructional Programs, Journal Of Educational Computing Research, 18(2), 183-196.
  12. Carroll, J. B. (1999). Expert Internet Information Access. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(3), 209-222
  13. Casey, C. (1996). Incorporating cognitive apprenticeship in multi-media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44, 74–84.
  14. Chambel, T., Zahn, C., & Finke, M. (2004). Hypervideo design and support for contextualized learning. Advanced Learning Technologies, IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies Proceedings ICALT’04, (pp 345-349).
  15. Chee, Y. C. (1995). Cognitive apprenticeship and its application to the teaching of Smalltalk in a multimedia interactive learning environment. Instructional Science, 23, 133161.
  16. Chen, Y., & Wang, J. Z. (2002). A region-based fuzzy feature matching approach to content-based image retrieval. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(9), 252-267.
  17. Cheung, K. M. (2000). An investigation of potential benefits of hyper-stereoscopic video for aerial search and reconnaisance. PhD Thesis, University of Toronto.
  18. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How learners study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
  19. Chittaro, L., Leronutti, L., & Ranon, R. (2004). Navigating 3D Virtual Environments by Following Embodied Agents: a Proposal and its Informal Evaluation on a Virtual Museum Application. PsychNology Journal, 2(1), 24-42.
  20. Doherty, P. B. (1998). Learner control in Asynchronous learning Environments. ALN Magazine, 2(2).
  21. Evensen, D. H., Salisbury-Glennon, J. D., & Glenn, J. (2001). A qualitative study of six medical students in a problem-based curriculum: Toward a situated model of selfregulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 659-676.
  22. Gamberini, L. & Bussolon, S. (2001). Human Navigation in Electronic Environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(1), 57-65
  23. Girgensohn, A., Shipman, F. & Wilcox, L. (2003). Hyper-Hitchcock: Authoring Interactive Video and Generating Interactive Summuaries. MULTIMEDIA ‘03 Proceedings of the eleventh ACM international conference on Multimedia (pp. 92-93).
  24. Glenn, D. (2010). How students can improve by studying themselves: Researchers at CUNY’s Graduate Center push “self-regulated learning”. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A1-A12.
  25. Halpern, D. F. (1996). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  26. Hannafin, R. D. & Sullivan, H. J. (1995). Learner Control in full and lean CAI Programs. ETR&D, 43(1), 19-30.
  27. Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99-136.
  28. Hegarty, M. (2004). Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction, 14, 343-352.
  29. Iran-Nejad, A., & Chissom, B. S. (1992). Contributions of active and dynamic self-regulation to learning. Innovative Higher Education, 17(2), 125-136.
  30. Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17, 329-343.
  31. Jiang, H., & Elmagarmid, A. K. (1998). Spatial and temporal content-based access to Hypervideo databases. VLDP Journal, 7, 226-238.
  32. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabinger, R. S. (1990). Problems and issues in designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning. In D. H. Jonassen, & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 3-25). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  33. Lajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 803-821). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  34. Livingston, J. A. (2000). A qualitative study of university students’ post-course strategy use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.
  35. Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2008). Self-Directed Learning in Problem-Based Learning and its Relationships with Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 411-427.
  36. Mayer, R. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  37. Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390–397.
  38. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2000). A Learner-Centered Approach to Multimedia Explanations: Deriving Instructional Design Principles from Cognitive Theory. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer Enhanced Learning (IMEJ), online version. Retrieved 19 October 2011 from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles.20000/2/05/index. Asp
  39. Myers, R. J., & Burton, J. K. (1994). The Foundations of Hypermedia: Concepts and History. Journal of Computers in the Schools, 10(1-2), 9-20.
  40. Onasick, R. K. T. (1994). Hypervideo: a qualitative tool for urban design: shadows of the unseen, voices of the unheard. PhD Thesis, Harvard University.
  41. Oren, T., Salomon, G., Kreitman, K., & Don, A. (1990). Guides: Characterizing the interface. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The art of human-computer interface design (pp. 367-381). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  42. Picher, O., Berk, E., Delvin, J., & Pugh, K. (1991). Hypermedia. In E. Berk & J. Delvin (Eds.). Hypertext/hypermedia handbook (pp. 23-52). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  43. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407.
  44. Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 269-286.
  45. Reeves, T. D. (2009). Toward a Treatment Effect of an Intervention to Foster Self-Regulated Learning (SRL): An Application of the Rasch Model. Unpublished Master dissertation, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.
  46. Reeves, T. D., & Stich, A. E. (2011). Tackling Suboptimal Bachelor’s Degree Completion Rates through Training in Self-Regulated Learning (SRL). Innovative Higher Education, 36(1), 3-17.
  47. Sawhney, N., Balcom, D., & Smith, I. (1997). Authoring and Navigating Video in Space and Time. IEEE MultiMedia Journal, 4(4), 30-39.
  48. Schapiro, S. R., & Livingston, J. A. (2000). Dynamic self-regulation: The driving force behind academic achievement. Innovative Higher Education, 25(1), 23-35.
  49. Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 285-307.
  50. Schnackenberg, H. L. & Sullivan, H. J. (2000). Learner Control over Full and lean computer-Based instruction under differing Ability levels. ETR&D, 48(2), 19-35.
  51. Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293-305.
  52. Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for education communications and technology (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  53. Smith, J.M., Stotts, D., & Kum, S. U. (2000). An Orthogonal Taxonomy of Hyperlink Anchor Generation in Video Streams Using OvalTine. Proceedings of the eleventh ACM on Hypertext and hypermedia (pp. 11-18).
  54. Song, H. S., Kalet, A. L., & Plass, J. L. (2011). Assessing medical students’ self-regulation as aptitude in computer-based learning. Advances in Health SciencesEducation, 16(1), 97-107.
  55. Tabbers, H., Martens, R., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 71-81.
  56. Tolhurst, D. (1992). A checklist for evaluating content-based hypertext computer software Educational Technology, 32(3), 17-21.
  57. Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A Comparison of Cognitive load Associated with Discovery Learning and Worked Examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 334-341.
  58. Wang, L., & Beasley, W. (2002). Effects of learner control and hypermedia preference on cyber-students performance in a Web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(1), 71-91.
  59. Winne, P. H. (1995). Self-regulation is ubiquitous but its forms vary with knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 30, 217-221.
  60. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153-189). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  61. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  62. Wouters, P., Tabbers, H. K., & Paas, F. (2007). Interactivity in Video-Based Models. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 327-342
  63. Young, J. D. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning Strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. ETR&D, 44(2), 17-27.
  64. Zahn, C., & Finke, M. (2003). Collaborative knowledge building based on hyperlinked video. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL), (pp. 173-175).
  65. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339.
  66. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 1339). San Diego: Academic

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@editlib.org.

Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org or use our online feedback form.