A Comparison between Common Item Equating with Pre-and Post-Reading and Listening Tests
New Search | Print Abstract | E-mail Abstract | Full Text | Save to My Collections | Export Citation |
Fujita, T. & Mayekawa, S.i. (2011). A Comparison between Common Item Equating with Pre-and Post-Reading and Listening Tests. In Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2011 (pp. 626-631). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/38779.
Conference Information

World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (ELEARN) 2011
Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
October 18, 2011
AACE
More Information on ELEARN
Table of Contents
Authors
Abstract
Although our final goal is constructing pre-and post-e-testing systems, as our first stage, we need to find the best system to equate pre-and post-tests in order to measure about 6,600 students’ growth in two years in a university language program. After conducting the evaluation procedure, we found that the 3PLcFix model could be the more appropriate one on reading tests while the 2PL model was the better fit for listening tests. The average gains in ability of reading and listening among the students who took pre-and post-tests were calculated separately with applying the more appropriate model. Results revealed that the average gain of reading ability was 0.3006 smaller than that of their listening ability. This could be because of larger equating errors in reading tests based on a passage whose ten common items could be locally dependent. Another possibility is that participants may have a general tendency of performing better or worse on passage-based items than on discrete items.
Also Read
- Designing with and for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Evolution of GeoThentic
- Using e-Learning Technologies in Developing Remeditainment Products for the Treatment of Children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD)
- Post degree online course in Haematopathology and e-Learning: description of an innovative curriculum in e-Learning
- Podcasts in Higher Education: What Students Want, What They Really Need, and How This Might be Supported
- Using RSS in Collaborative Course Development
- Teaching for Success: Technology and Learning Styles in Preservice Teacher Education
- Reducing E-Learning Development Costs Using a Streamlined XML-based Approach
- Using Authentic Situations and Avatars to Build Knowledge in an E-Learning Environment
- Inspiring Learning and Teaching: Using e-tools to Facilitate Change
- Scenario making support in PBL
Tags
Add tagComments & Discussion
Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.


New comment