Formative Evaluation via Technology-Mediated Peer Assessment
PROCEEDINGS
Chun Hu, Wai Yat Wong, Vilma Fyfe, Heman Chan, University of Sydney, Australia
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Toronto, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-81-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Abstract
This paper reports an experience of pre-service teachers using formative evaluation in the design and development of a web-based learning resource (a course assignment). Before the final submission, 16 students had their web-based learning resources reviewed by two pairs of peers in one of the two modes. Four pairs used Camtasia to record their screen movements. The videos were then uploaded to EVA, a video annotation platform, where the students viewed the videos and discussed the peer critiques. The other four pairs did not use either of the technologies. All the students filled out a paper-based review form. An analysis showed that the main changes made after the peer review by those who used EVA were mostly on the clarifications of user instructions and improvement of learning activity design. The changes made by the student who did not use the technologies were on the improvements of interface design and making links to work.
Citation
Hu, C., Wong, W.Y., Fyfe, V. & Chan, H. (2010). Formative Evaluation via Technology-Mediated Peer Assessment. In J. Herrington & C. Montgomerie (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2010--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1508-1513). Toronto, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/34837/.
© 2010 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Asteriadis, S., Tzouveli, P., Karpouzis, K., & Kollias, S. (2007). Non-verbal feedback on user interest based on gaze direction and head pose. Proceedings of Second International Workshop on Semantic Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP) 2007, pp.171-178. Retrieved December 8, 2009 from
- Collis, B. (1996). The Internet as an educational innovation: Lessons from experience with computer implementation. Educational Technology, 36(6), 21-30.
- Falchikov, N. & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322.
- Flagg, B.N. (1990). Formative Evaluation for Educational Technologies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
- Freeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of groupwork. Assessment& Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(3), 289-300.
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
- Kluger, A.N. & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin March, 119(2), 254284.
- Liu, E.Z.F., Lin, S.S.J., & Yuan, S.M. (2002). Alternatives to instructor assessment: A case study of comparing self and peer assessment with instructor assessment under a networked innovative assessment procedures. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 395-404.
- Liu, N., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education. 11(3), 279-290.
- Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Records, 108(6), 1017-1054.
- Mehrens, W.A., Popham, W.J., & Ryan, J.M. (1998). How to prepare students for performance assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(1), 18-22.
- Neuwirth, C.M., Chandook, R., Charney, D., Wojahn, P., & Kim, L. (1994). Distributed collaborative writing: A comparison of spoken and written modalities for reviewing and revising documents. Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction ‘94 Conference, April 24-28, 1994, Boston Massachusetts (pp. 51-57). New
- Prins, F., Sluijsmans, D., Kirschner, P., & Strijbos, J. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: a case study. Assessment& Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 417-444.
- Topping, K.J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
- Topping, K. & Ehly, S. (1998). Peer Assisted Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Topping, K.J., Smith, E.F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment& Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169.
- Wong, W.Y., & Reimann, P. (2009). Web based educational video teaching and learning platform with collaborative annotation. Paper presented at Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, (Riga, Latvia, July 15-July 17 2009).-1513 DASHDASH
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References