Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Journals > JTATE > Volume 19, Issue 4 >
Login or register for free to remove ads.

Supporting Teachers’ Use of a Project-Based Learning Environment in Ocean Science: Web-Based Educative Curriculum Materials

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Golan Duncan, R., El-Moslimany, H., McDonnell, J. & Lichtenwalner, S. (2011). Supporting Teachers’ Use of a Project-Based Learning Environment in Ocean Science: Web-Based Educative Curriculum Materials. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(4), 449-472. Chesapeake, VA: SITE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/33233.

OpenURL Link

Journal Information

JTATE

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education
ISSN 1059-7069
Volume 19, Issue 4, October 2011
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education  Chesapeake, VA

More Information on JTATE

Table of Contents


Authors

Ravit Golan Duncan, Hebbah El-Moslimany, Janice McDonnell, Sage Lichtenwalner, Rutgers University, United States

Abstract

The development of inquiry and project-based materials is challenging in many ways, not the least of which is the design of supports for teachers implementing such materials. We report on the design of educative and just-in-time teacher supports for an online project-based unit in ocean science. The teacher supports were visible as tabs on the student interface and the information provided was divided into four complementary categories: in-class notes, student difficulties, related activities, and resources. These categories reflect the recommendations of Ball and Cohen (1996) and heuristics of Davis and Krajcik (2005) for designing educative curriculum materials. We examined teachers’ perception and use of these supports in a pilot study with 18 middle and high school teachers. Our findings suggest that overall teachers found the supports useful although they did not seem to use them in a just-in-time fashion. There were many instances in which teachers’ interpretation of the guidance provided and their resulting implementation varied from the designers’ intent. Our analysis revealed several themes that account for these variations: differences in the segmentation of the unit activities, underdeveloped or underspecified supports, pedagogical disagreements regarding the implementation strategies, and logistical difficulties.

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.