Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Journals > JILR > Volume 21, Issue 1 >
Login or register for free to remove ads.

An Exploratory Study of Interactivity in Visualization Tools: ‘Flow’ of Interaction

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Liang, H.N., Parsons, P.C., Wu, H.C. & Sedig, K. (2010). An Exploratory Study of Interactivity in Visualization Tools: ‘Flow’ of Interaction. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(1), 5-45. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/32419.

OpenURL Link

Journal Information

JILR

Journal of Interactive Learning Research
ISSN 1093-023X
Volume 21, Issue 1, January 2010
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)  Chesapeake, VA

More Information on JILR

Table of Contents


Authors

Hai-Ning Liang, Paul C. Parsons, Hsien-Chi Wu, Kamran Sedig, The University of Western Ontario, Canada

Abstract

** Invited as a paper from ED-MEDIA 2009 ** This paper deals with the design of interactivity in visualization tools. There are several factors that can be used to guide the analysis and design of the interactivity of these tools. One such factor is flow, which is concerned with the duration of interaction with visual representations of information—interaction being the actions performed by users on these representations and the reactions given back by the representations. Four forms of flow can be identified: 1) continuous action, continuous reaction; 2) continuous action, discrete reaction; 3) discrete action, continuous reaction; and 4) discrete action, discrete reaction. Structuring micro-level interactions of tools based on these forms of flow can have varying effects on the cognitive processes of users. Based on this classification of flow, four versions of an interactive visualization tool were created and studied. The testbed for this study was 3D geometric solids—more specifically, Platonic and Archimedean solids. A multi-method empirical study was conducted to evaluate the usability of these four interfaces and their effect on learning, visual thinking, and exploration. This paper reports some findings of this study.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.