Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Journals > JEMH > Volume 19, Issue 1 >
Login or register for free to remove ads.

Improving Learning in Computer-based Instruction Through Question Type and Grouping Strategies

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Niemczyk, M. & Savenye, W. (2010). Improving Learning in Computer-based Instruction Through Question Type and Grouping Strategies. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(1), 79-102. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/32362.

OpenURL Link

Journal Information

JEMH

Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia
ISSN 1055-8896
Volume 19, Issue 1, 2010
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)  Chesapeake, VA

More Information on JEMH

Table of Contents


Authors

Mary Niemczyk, Wilhemina Savenye, Arizona State University, United States

Abstract

This study investigated the comparative effects of adjunct questions, student self-generated questions, and note taking on learning from a multimedia database. High school students worked individually or in cooperative dyads on a computer-based multimedia unit using a study guide to answer either adjunct questions, generate self-questions, or take notes to accomplish a learning task. There were two criterion measures, a posttest and an attitude survey. Other data collected included informal observations, student interviews and review of the student study guides. The dependent variable was achievement as determined by posttest score. Analyses were conducted using both traditional Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) techniques as well as hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). Because of the dependency of scores of students working in pairs, it was determined that HLM techniques were more appropriate. Results of ANOVA analyses yielded significant differences, however, HLM analyses did not. The correlations of posttest scores of students working in pairs seemed to indicate possible levels of cooperation. Student interview responses and review of student study guides seemed to provide indications of how students utilized the questioning or note-taking strategies while working in this environment. Implications for the design of instruction are discussed.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.