U.S. Virtual School Trial Period and Course Completion Policy Study
New Search | Print Abstract | E-mail Abstract | Full Text | Save to My Collections | Export Citation |
Gonzales, A.H. & Barbour, M.K. (2008). U.S. Virtual School Trial Period and Course Completion Policy Study. In C. Bonk et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2008 (pp. 2653-2660). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/30043.
Conference Information

World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (ELEARN) 2008
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
November 17, 2008
ISBN 1-880094-66-5
Curtis J. Bonk, Mimi Miyoung Lee & Tom Reynolds
AACE
More Information on ELEARN
Table of Contents
Authors
Abstract
Variations in the policies used by virtual schools in relation to course enrollment trial periods and course completion impact the comparability of attrition statistics. We contacted 159 U.S. virtual schools and received responses from 86 schools, a response rate of 54%. 68.6% of respondents had trial periods that varied from one day to 185 days. Course completion definitions varied considerably from remaining in the course irrespective of the final grade to receiving an A-, considered a passing grade. These differences were examined based upon geographical region and school type. We recommend virtual schools adopt multiple measures for calculating student attrition to allow meaningful comparisons between virtual and also with brick and mortar schools.
Also Read
- SALMS: SCORM-compliant Adaptive LMS
- Role-Based Design: Rethinking Innovation and Creativity in Instructional Design
- Development of social presence scale
- E-learning and ADDIE Model
- Supporting Teachers’ Use of a Project-Based Learning Environment in Ocean Science: Web-Based Educative Curriculum Materials
- Gameproject: A Multimedia Presentation Of A Joint Project For A Degree In Education
- Designing an E-learning Experience to Stimulate Interprofessional Practice in Health and Social Care
- Supporting the diversity of the E-learning 2.0 learners: The development of a psychological student model
- Towards Personalised and Adaptive Multimedia in M-learning Systems
- Students with Learning Difficulties: Web 2.0 Resources for Response to Intervention (RTI)
Tags
Add tagComments & Discussion
Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.


New comment