Special Education Teachers’ Use of Assistive Technology With Students Who Have Severe Disabilities
Save to My Collections
Connor, C., Snell, M., Gansneder, B. & Dexter, S. (2010). Special Education Teachers’ Use of Assistive Technology With Students Who Have Severe Disabilities. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(3), 369-386. Chesapeake, VA: SITE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/28334.
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education
Volume 18, Issue 3, July 2010
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education Chesapeake, VA
More Information on JTATE
Abstract Teachers’ integration of computer-based assistive technology has been linked to positive educational outcomes for students with disabilities. This study was conducted to identify factors that are predictive of integrating assistive technology into teaching practices among general and special education teachers of students with severe disabilities. A survey was developed for teachers who instructed students who used computer-based assistive technology. Stepwise regression analyses were conducted to identify factors that contributed to the amount of student use of assistive technology. Out of seven independent variables, teacher preparedness was determined to be the primary significant predictor of student assistive technology use. Implications of this and other findings are discussed in light of the way in which teacher preparation can be enhanced to support teachers’ integration of assistive technology.
- Inclusive Education
- Preservice Teacher Education
- Professional Development
- Teaching Methods
- Anderson, C. L., & Petch-hogan, B. (2001). The impact of technology use in special education field experience on preservice teachers’ perceived technology expertise. Journal of Special Education Technology 16, 27-44.
- Bai, H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2008). Teacher educators’ beliefs and technology uses as predictors of preservice teachers’ beliefs and technology attitudes. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 16(1), 93-112.
- Bradshaw, L. K. (2002). Technology for teaching and learning: Strategies for staff development and follow-up support. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 131-150.
- Chen, L. (2005). The technology competency of preservice special education teachers in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, university of Virginia, Charlottesville.
- Chiero, R. T. (1997). Teachers’ perspectives on factors that affect computer use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 133-145.
- Clark, K. D. (2000). Urban middle school teachers’ use of instructional technology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 178-193.
- Derer, K., Polsgrove, L., & Rieth, H. (1996). A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 62-80.
- Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys (2nd ed.). New york: John Wiley & Sons.
- Evans, R. (1996). The human side of school change. New york: Jossey-Bass. Gershner, V. T., & Snider, S. L. (2001). Integrating the use of internet as an instructional tool: examining the process of change. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25, 283-301.
- Hardy, J. V. (1998). Teacher attitudes toward and knowledge of computer technology. Computers in the Schools, 14, 199-237.
- Hong, S., & Koh, C. (2002). Computer anxiety and attitudes toward computers among rural secondary school teachers: a Malaysian perspective. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 27-47.
- Janney, R.E., & Snell, M. E. (2004). Practices for inclusive schools: Modifying schoolwork (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
- Kent-Walsh, J. E., & Light, J. C. (2003). General education teachers’ experiences with students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(2) 104-124.
- Ludlow, B. L. (2001). Technology and teacher education in special education: disaster or deliverance? Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 143-163.
- Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1994). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 220-236.
- Maushak, N. J., Kelly, P., & Blodgett, T. (2001). Preparing teachers for the inclusive classroom: a preliminary study of attitudes and knowledge of assistive technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 419-431.
- McGregor, G., & Pachuski, P. (1996). Assistive technology in schools: are teachers ready, able, and supported? Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 4-15.
- Michaels, C. A., & Mcdermott, J. (2003). Assistive technology integration in special education teacher preparation: Program coordinators’ perceptions of current attainment and importance. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18, 29-41.
- Mueller, R. O. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Back to basics. Structural Equation Modeling 4(4), 353-369.
- Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J., & Elliot, S. (2003). No access, no use, no impact: Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 15-203.
- Ross, J. A., hogaboam-Gray, A., & Hannay, L. (1999). Predictors of teachers’ confidence in their ability to implement computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21, 75-97.
- Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1996). Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion, 1958-1995: a research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 63, 59-74.
- Schlosser, R. W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternate communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: a systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(3), 212-229.
- Todis, B. (1996). Tools for the task? Perspectives on assistive technology in education settings. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 49-61.
- Van Braak, J. (2001). Individual characteristics influencing teachers’ class use of computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25, 141-157.
- Yildirim, S. (2000). Effects of an educational computing course on preservice and inservice teachers: a discussion and analysis of attitudes and use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 479-495.
- Designing with and for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Evolution of GeoThentic
- Using e-Learning Technologies in Developing Remeditainment Products for the Treatment of Children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD)
- Post degree online course in Haematopathology and e-Learning: description of an innovative curriculum in e-Learning
- Podcasts in Higher Education: What Students Want, What They Really Need, and How This Might be Supported
- Using RSS in Collaborative Course Development
- Teaching for Success: Technology and Learning Styles in Preservice Teacher Education
- Reducing E-Learning Development Costs Using a Streamlined XML-based Approach
- Using Authentic Situations and Avatars to Build Knowledge in an E-Learning Environment
- Inspiring Learning and Teaching: Using e-tools to Facilitate Change
- Scenario making support in PBL
Comments & Discussion
Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.