Promises and Pitfalls of Implementing a Digital Portfolio Assessment System: Lessons Learned and Next Steps Part II PROCEEDINGS
Allison Clark, Michele Ballentine-Linch, Betty Wood, Andrew Hunt, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA Publisher: AACE, Chesapeake, VA
This qualitative study is a continuation of a study that investigated the adoption and implementation of digital portfolios in the College of Education (COE) at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock (UALR). The study tracked progress from the early ideas that culminated in shopping for software that would meet the needs of the COE and National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) to the current status of having implemented the chosen software. Specifically measured are faculty surveys which summarize their perceptions which led to a list of suggestions and concerns. This needs assessment led to a focus group being formed which consists of representatives from each program in the COE. Participants in this session will be able to discuss where they are in the process of digital portfolios and network with colleagues which will likely benefit their educational institution.
Clark, A., Ballentine-Linch, M., Wood, B. & Hunt, A. (2008). Promises and Pitfalls of Implementing a Digital Portfolio Assessment System: Lessons Learned and Next Steps Part II. In K. McFerrin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 32-37). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved March 11, 2014 from http://www.editlib.org/p/27125.
© 2008 AACE