Hybrid Instruction 101: It’s in the Design
PROCEEDINGS
Antonia D'Onofrio, Kathleen Bowes, Widener University, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Quebec City, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-63-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA
Abstract
Abstract. The development of hybrid/blended courses has become a growing trend in higher education. Since hybrid instruction combines face-to-face instruction with elements of online learning, the crafting of a meaningful course design can be daunting. Instructional strategies that blend face-to-face instruction, online projects, and activities that use asynchronous and synchronous instruction are the cornerstones of this design. Instructors need to incorporate technology elements, such as, message boards, email, and chats, in such a way that instruction does not simply mirror traditional instruction but exploits interactive aspects of pedagogy. This paper explores a number of design alternatives that address the problem of matching instructional design to instructional purposes.
Citation
D'Onofrio, A. & Bowes, K. (2007). Hybrid Instruction 101: It’s in the Design. In T. Bastiaens & S. Carliner (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2007--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1500-1506). Quebec City, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/26561/.
© 2007 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Blignaut, A. & Trollip, S. (2003). Measuring Faculty Participation in Asynchronous Discussion Forums. Journal of Education for Business, 78 (6). 347-353.
- Fanter, A. (2005). The future of instructional models. WorldWide Learn. Retrieved February 4, 2007, http://www.worldwidelearn.com/education-articles/hybrid-education.html.
- Gould, T (2003) Hybrid classes: Maximizing institutional resources and student learning. Proceedings of the 2003 ASCUE Conference. Myrtle Beach, SC: Association of Small Computer Users in Education. Granham, C. & Kaleta, R. Introduction to hybrid courses, Teaching with Technology Today, 8. Retrieved February 4, 2007, http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm.
- Hricko, M. (2002). Developing an interactive web-based classroom. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development. 14(4), 1824.
- Lorenzetti, P. (2004). For Quality and Cost Effectiveness, Build a Hybrid Program. Distance Education Report, 8(21), 2-7.
- Marques, O., Woodbury, J, Hsu, S., & Chariots, S. (1998). Design and development of a hybrid instruction model for a new teaching paradigm. The original version of this paper was given at the Frontiers in Education 28th Annual Conference, Tempe, AZ.: November, 1998.
- Murphy, P. (2002). The hybrid strategy: Blending face-to-face with virtual instruction to improve large lecture courses. Teaching Learning Technology Center. University of California Regents. Retrieved February 4, 2007, http://www.ucop.edu/tltc/news/2002/12/feature.php. Nguyen, T. & Lixie, A. (2007). Knowledge acquisition in hybrid classrooms. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 1090-1096). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
- Reasons, S. (2004). Hybrid courses– Hidden Dangers? Distance Education Report. 8(7), 3-6.
- Sands, P. (2002). Inside-outside, upside-downside: Strategies for connecting online with face-to-face instruction in hybrid instruction. Teaching With Technology Today, 8. Retrieved February 4, 2007 http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/browse/hybrid.htm.Soules,M.(2002)Hybridonlinecoursesandstrategiesforcollaboration.RetrievedFebruary4,2007,http://www.mala.bc.ca/~soules/hybrid-2.htm.
- Spilka, R. (2002). Approximately “real world” learning with the hybrid model. Teaching With Technology Today, 8. Retrieved February 4, 2007, http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/spilka.htm.
- Tuckerman, B. (2002). Evaluating ADAPT: A hybrid instructional modelcombiningWeb-based and classroom components. Computers and Education, 39, 261-269.
- Utts, J., Sommer, B., Acredolo, C., Maher, M.W., & Matthews, H.R. (2004). A study comparing traditional and hybrid internetbased instruction in introductory statistics classes. Journal of Statistics Education (11). Retrieved February 4, 2007, http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v11n3/utts.html.
- Yuliang, L. (2007). How to provide formative feedback to improve online learner satisfaction and learning? Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 408-411). Chesapeake, VA:
- Fanter, A. (2005). The future of instructional models. WorldWide Learn. Retrieved February 4, 2007, http://www.worldwidelearn.com/education-articles/hybrid-education.html.
- Gould, T (2003) Hybrid classes: Maximizing institutional resources and student learning. Proceedings of the 2003 ASCUE Conference. Myrtle Beach, SC: Association of Small Computer Users in Education. Granham, C. & Kaleta, R. Introduction to hybrid courses, Teaching with Technology Today, 8. Retrieved February 4, 2007, http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm.
- Hricko, M. (2002). Developing an interactive web-based classroom. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development. 14(4), 1824.
- Lorenzetti, P. (2004). For Quality and Cost Effectiveness, Build a Hybrid Program. Distance Education Report, 8(21), 2-7.
- Marques, O., Woodbury, J, Hsu, S., & Chariots, S. (1998). Design and development of a hybrid instruction model for a new teaching paradigm. The original version of this paper was given at the Frontiers in Education 28th Annual Conference, Tempe, AZ.: November, 1998.
- Murphy, P. (2002). The hybrid strategy: Blending face-to-face with virtual instruction to improve large lecture courses. Teaching Learning Technology Center. University of California Regents. Retrieved February 4, 2007, http://www.ucop.edu/tltc/news/2002/12/feature.php. Nguyen, T. & Lixie, A. (2007). Knowledge acquisition in hybrid classrooms. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 1090-1096). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
- Reasons, S. (2004). Hybrid courses– Hidden Dangers? Distance Education Report. 8(7), 3-6.
- Sands, P. (2002). Inside-outside, upside-downside: Strategies for connecting online with face-to-face instruction in hybrid instruction. Teaching With Technology Today, 8. Retrieved February 4, 2007 http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/browse/hybrid.htm.Soules,M.(2002)Hybridonlinecoursesandstrategiesforcollaboration.RetrievedFebruary4,2007,http://www.mala.bc.ca/~soules/hybrid-2.htm.
- Spilka, R. (2002). Approximately “real world” learning with the hybrid model. Teaching With Technology Today, 8. Retrieved February 4, 2007, http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/spilka.htm.
- Tuckerman, B. (2002). Evaluating ADAPT: A hybrid instructional modelcombiningWeb-based and classroom components. Computers and Education, 39, 261-269.
- Utts, J., Sommer, B., Acredolo, C., Maher, M.W., & Matthews, H.R. (2004). A study comparing traditional and hybrid internetbased instruction in introductory statistics classes. Journal of Statistics Education (11). Retrieved February 4, 2007, http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v11n3/utts.html.
- Yuliang, L. (2007). How to provide formative feedback to improve online learner satisfaction and learning? Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 408-411). Chesapeake, VA:
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References