Login or register for free to remove ads.

Altered Geometry: A New Angle on Teacher Technophobia Article

, Queensland University of Technology, Australia ; , University of Southern Queensland, Australia

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 17, Number 1, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Chesapeake, VA


Teacher technophobia is analyzed using an activity systems framework and we contend that technophobic teachers make the mistake of confusing and collapsing the tool into the object thereby figuratively altering the geometry of the classic activity system triangle. Three case studies of technophobic teachers are reviewed and compared with observations of a teacher described as exemplary but whose practice exhibited technophobic characteristics. The teachers in this paper shared four mental models, that is, (a) teacher as expert, (b) student as inexpert, (c) ICT as being restricted to productivity applications, and (d) schooling as the achievement of purposeful outcomes. We conclude that teachers with technophobic characteristics act logically in terms of their worldview but that this leaves them with either no or limited processes to enact change and no clear view as to where they are heading.


Lloyd, M. & Albion, P. (2009). Altered Geometry: A New Angle on Teacher Technophobia. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(1), 65-84. Chesapeake, VA: SITE.




  1. Backhouse, B. (2003). Information and communication technology integration: beyond the early adopters. TechTrends, 47(3), 5-9.
  2. Bailey, B. (2000). The impact of mandated change on teachers. In N. Bascia & A. Hargreaves (eds.), The sharp edge of educational change (pp. 112-128). London: routledge Falmer.
  3. Becker, H. J. (2001, April). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the 2001 meeting of the American educational research Association, Seattle, WA.
  4. Browne, D.L., & Ritchie, D.C. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: A model of staff development for implementing technology in schools. Contemporary Education, 64(1), 2834.
  5. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
  6. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
  7. Davis, M., & Eslinger, D. (2001). Acquisition of computer skills and practices by K-8 classroom teachers. Contemporary Education, 72(2), 5-10.
  8. Day, C., & Roberts-Holmes, G. (1998). The best of times, the worst of times: Stories of change and professional development in england. Change: Transformations in Education, 1(1), 15-31.
  9. Dwyer, D. (1995). Changing the conversation about teaching, learning and technology: A report on 10 years of ACOT research. Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer.
  10. Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: orieta-Konsultit.
  11. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(4), 2539.
  12. Guskey, T.R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15, 5-12.
  13. Hall, G., & Hord, S. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State university of New York Press.
  14. Hodas, S. (1993). Technology refusal and the organizational culture of schools. Retrieved November 10, 2008, from http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v1n10.html
  15. Jonassen, D.H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: merrill.
  16. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle river, NJ: merrill.
  17. Jonscher, C. (2000). Wiredlife: Who are we in the digital age? london: Anchor.
  18. King, K. (2002, may) A journey of transformation: A model of educators’ learning experiences in educational technology. Paper presented at the Adult education research Conference, raleigh NC. (erIC Document reproduction Service No. ED 472069)
  19. Lloyd, M., & Albion, P. (2005). Mistaking the tool for the outcome: using activity system theory to understand the complexity of teacher technophobia. In C. Crawford, D. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2005 (pp. 1480-1487). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in education.
  20. Lloyd, M., & Mcrobbie, C. (2005). The “whole approach”: An investigation of a schoolbased practicum model of teacher professional development in ICT. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(4), 341-351.
  21. Lloyd, M., & Yelland, N. (2003, may). Adaptation and avoidance: observations of teachers’ reactions to information and communications technology in the classroom. Change: Transformation in Education, 6(1), 81-96.
  22. Marcinkiewicz, H.R. (1993). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Teacher Education, 26, 220237.
  23. Maslen, G. (1995, August 8). Information rich, information poor. The Bulletin (pp. 12-15). Mevarech, Z.. (1997). The u-Curve process that trainee teaches experience in integrating computers into the curriculum. In D. Passey & B. Samways (eds.), Information technology: Supporting change through teacher education (pp. 46-51). London: Chapman & Hall.
  24. Nias, J. (1999). Teachers’ moral purposes: Stress, vulnerability and strength. In R.Vandenberghe & A.M.Huberman (eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 223-237). New York: Cambridge university Press.
  25. Oliver, R. (1994). Factors influencing beginning teachers’ uptake of computers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2(1), 71-89.
  26. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
  27. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
  28. Turkle, S. (1996). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  29. Watson, D. (2001). Pedagogy before technology: re-thinking the relationship between ICT and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 6(4), 251-266.
  30. Wertsch, J. (1981). (ed.). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. White Plains, NY: M. Sharpe.
  31. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. (2003). Factors affecting technology use in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@editlib.org.

Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org or use our online feedback form.