Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Journals > CITE Journal > Volume 8, Issue 3 >
Login or register for free to remove ads.

Web-Supported Communities for Teacher Professional Development: Five Cautions

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

HTML version at citejournal.org

Najafi, H. & Clarke, A. (2008). Web-Supported Communities for Teacher Professional Development: Five Cautions. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 244-263. AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/25320.

OpenURL Link

Journal Information

CITE

Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education
ISSN 1528-5804
Volume 8, Issue 3, September 2008
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

More Information on CITE Journal

Table of Contents


Authors

Hedieh Najafi, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto, Canada; Anthony Clarke, University of British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

This interpretive case study explores an attempt to add an online component-the On-line Literacy Project-to a successful face-to-face professional development community. Participants were six members of the Literacy Project, which was carried out in the school board of a western Canadian city. The principal theoretical framework informing the study was Lave and Wegner's (1991) community of practice. Analysis of data, collected over 7 months, showed that although participants acknowledged the potential of the Online Literacy Project the concept was poorly understood, received little support, and was not deemed relevant for a number of reasons, many of which are reported in the information and communication technology literature. However, a number of distinctive factors emerged in this study that serve as cautions for others interested in similar professional development endeavors.

Keywords

References

  1. Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. H. Jonassen & S. L. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-55). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  2. Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J. A., & Cunningham, D. J. (2001). Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71-96.
  3. Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Designing system dualities: Characterizing an online professional development community. In Barab, R. Kling, & J.
  4. Barnett, M. (2002). Issues and trends concerning electronic networking technologies for teacher professional development: A critical review of the literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
  5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
  6. Clarke, T., Storlund, J., Wells, J., & Wong, G. (2004). Improving literacy standards through a systemwide approach to professional learning. Paper presented at the National Staff Development Council 2004 conference, Vancouver, BC.
  7. Cuthbert, A., Clark, D. B., & Linn, M. (2002). WISE learning communities: Design considerations. In K. A. Renninger, & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 215-248). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Fusco, J., Gehlbach, H., & Schlager, M. (2000). Assessing the impact of a large-scale online teacher professional development community. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education
  9. International Conference 2000 (pp. 2178-2183). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
  10. Guskey, T. R. (2003). Result-oriented professional development. In A. Ornstein, L. Behar-Horenstein, & E. Pajak (Eds.), Contemporary issues in curriculum (3rd ed. Pp. 321-329). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
  11. Harasim, L., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1997). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  12. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of incertainty. New York: Teachers College Press.
  13. Havelock, B. (2004). Online community and professional learning in education: Research-based keys to sustainability. AACE Journal, 12(1), 56-84.
  14. Huberman, M. (1992). Teacher professional development and instructional mastry. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teachers development (pp. 122-132). New York: Teachers College Press.
  15. Klecka, K. (2003, April). Trust, safety, and confidence: Building the foundation for
  16. Klecka, C., Clift, R. T., & Cheng, Y. (2005). Are electronic conferences a solution in search of an urban problem? Urban Education, 40(4), 412-429.
  17. Klecka, C. L., Clift, R. T., & Thomas, A. T. (2002). Proceed with caution: Introducing electronic conferencing in teacher education. Critical Issues in Teacher Education, 9, 2836.
  18. Kling, R., & Courtright, C. (2004). Group behavior and learning in electronic forums: A sociotechnical approach. In S. Barab, R. Kling & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 91-119). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Lave, J. (1997). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In D.
  20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 581-596.
  22. Loucks-Horsely, S., Harding, C. K., Arbuckle, M. A., Murray, L. B., Dubea, C., & Williams, M. K. (1987). Continuing to learn: A guide for teacher development. Andover, MA: The Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of Northeast and Islands.
  23. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing
  24. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  25. Merkel, C. B., Xiao, L. Farooq, U., Ganoe, C. H., Lee, R., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2004, July). Participatory design in community computing contexts: Tales from the
  26. Field. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2004 (pp. 1-10). New York: Association for Computing Machinery
  27. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
  28. Muscella, D., & DiMauro, V. (1995). Talking about science: The case of an electronic conversation. Cambridge, MA: TERC Communications.
  29. Reynolds, E., Treahy, D., Chao, C., & Barab, S. (2001). The Internet learning forum: Developing a community prototype for teachers of the 21st century. Computers in the Schools, 17(3/4), 107-125.
  30. Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (2004). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? In S. A. Barab, R.
  31. Schlager, M., Fusco, J., Koch, M., Crawford, V., & Phillips, M. (2003, June). Designing equity and diversity into online strategies to support new teachers. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Seattle, WA.
  32. Schlager, M. S., Fusco, J., & Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an online education community of practice. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual
  33. Selwyn, N. (2000). Creating a ‘connected’ community? Teachers’ use of an electronic discussion group. Teachers College Record, 101(4), 750-778.
  34. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  35. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  36. Zhao, Y., & Rop, S. (2001). A critical review of the literature on electronic networks as reflective discourse communities for inservice teachers. Education and Information Technology, 6(2), 81-94.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@editlib.org.

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.