Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Journals > CITE Journal > Volume 8, Issue 4 >

Automated Essay Scoring Versus Human Scoring: A Correlational Study

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

HTML version at citejournal.org

Wang, J. & Stallone Brown, M. (2008). Automated Essay Scoring Versus Human Scoring: A Correlational Study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 310-325. AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/25295.

OpenURL Link

Journal Information

CITE

Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education
ISSN 1528-5804
Volume 8, Issue 4, December 2008
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

More Information on CITE Journal

Table of Contents


Authors

Jinhao Wang, South Texas College, USA; Michelle Stallone Brown, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, USA

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to analyze the relationship between automated essay scoring (AES) and human scoring in order to determine the validity and usefulness of AES for large-scale placement tests. Specifically, a correlational research design was used to examine the correlations between AES performance and human raters' performance. Spearman rank correlation coefficient tests were utilized for data analyses. Results from the data analyses showed no statistically significant correlation between the overall holistic scores assigned by the AES tool and the overall holistic scores assigned by faculty human raters or human raters who scored another standardized writing test. On the other hand, there was a significant correlation between scores assigned by two teams of human raters. A significant correlation was also present between AES and faculty human scoring in Dimension 4 - Sentence Structure, but no significant correlations existed in other dimensions. Findings from the current study do not corroborate previous findings on AES tools. Implications of these findings for English educators reveal that AES tools have limited capability at this point and that more reliable measures for assessment, like writing portfolios and conferencing, still need to be a part of the methods repertoire.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.