Pedagogy First! Making Web-Technologies Work for Soft Skills Development in Leadership and Management Education
Save to My Collections
Morgan, G. & Adams, J. (2009). Pedagogy First! Making Web-Technologies Work for Soft Skills Development in Leadership and Management Education. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(2), 129-155. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/25256.
Journal of Interactive Learning Research
Volume 20, Issue 2, April 2009
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) Chesapeake, VA
More Information on JILR
Most will agree that the use of Internet to support teaching and learning has become a mainstay of management education with the widespread use of online content, discussion boards, document sharing, email, virtual classrooms, etc. But, whether it is effective or not is debatable. Sometimes learners and instructors report very positive experiences. Other times the results are less than ideal. Considering the sizeable time, effort, and expense involved in designing and implementing web-based courses, this can be particularly disappointing for everyone involved. Our experience sheds new light on this issue. We have discovered that developing management soft skills (e.g., critical thinking) online requires a fundamentally different approach from that of technical hard skills (e.g., book keeping). Technologies that promote one skill set generally get in the way of the other. The mismatch between the required pedagogy and use of technology, we argue, lies at the heart of the disappointment. This article alerts educators to the problems and the questions that need to be asked, and provides a case study illustrating the importance of aligning pedagogy and technology.
- Adams, J., and Morgan, G. (2007). “‘Second Generation’ e-Learning: Characteristics and Design Principles for Supporting Management Soft Skills Development.” International Journal on ELearning, 6(2),157-185.
- Adams, J., and Morgan, G. (2006a). “Blended Learning: Four Models for Integrating Work and Learning for Improved Job Performance.” Schulich School of Business Working Paper. York University, Toronto, Canada.
- Adams, J., and Morgan, G. (2006b). “The “Soft Skills” Learning Triangle for Management
- Alavi, M., and Gallupe, R. (2003). “Using Information Technology in Learning: Case studies in business and management education programs.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(2), 139-153.
- Alavi, M., Maracas, G., and Yoo, Y. (2002). “A comparative study of distributed learning environments on learning outcomes.” Information Systems Research, 13(4), 404-418.
- Aldrich, C. (2003). Simulations and the Future of Learning: An innovative (and Perhaps Revolutionary) Approach to e-Learning. Pfeiffer/A Wiley Imprint.
- Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by Doing: A Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, Computer Games, and Pedagogy in E-Learning and Other Educational Experiences. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Allen, M. (2002). Michael Allen's Guide to E-Learning: Building Interactive, Fun, and Effective Learning Programs for Any Company. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Anderson, T. (2003). “Modes of interaction in Distance Education: Recent developments and research questions.” In M. Moore and W. Anderson (eds), Handbook of Distance Education (pp.129-144). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
- Arbaugh, J. (2000). “Virtual classroom versus physical classroom: An exploratory study of class discussion patterns and student learning in an asynchronous Internet-based MBA course.” Journal of Management Education, 24(2), 213-234.
- Arbaugh. J. (2005). “Is there an Optimal Design for On-Line MBA Courses?” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 135-149.
- Arbaugh, J., and Duray, R. (2002). “Technology and Structural Characteristics, Student learning and Satisfaction with Web-based Courses: An exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs.” Management Learning, 33(3), 331-347.
- Argyris, C., and Schon, D. (1974). Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Argyris, C., and Schon, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
- Arnett, B. (2001). “Why companies, even large technology companies, have difficulty exploiting learning technology-An IBM example.” In M. Rosenberg, e-Learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age (pp. 111-115). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Baker, A., Jensen, P., and Kolb, D. (2002). Conversational Learning. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Beaudoin, M. (2002). “Learning or Lurking? Tracking the “Invisible” Online Student.” The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 147-155.
- Bennis, W., and O’Toole, P. (2005). “How Business Schools Lost Their Way.” Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96-105.
- Benbunan-Fich, R. (2002). “Improving Education and Training with Information Technology.” Communications of the ACM, 45(6), 94-99.
- Bjørndal, T., Gordon, D., Kaitala, V., and Lindroos, M. (2004). “International Management Strategies for a Straddling Fish Stock: A Bio-Economic Simulation Model of the Norwegian Spring-Spawning Herring Fishery.” Environmental and Resource Economics, 29(4), 435-457.
- Bothams, J., and Fordyce, L. (2002). “Barriers to on-line learning – the experience of the Scottish Executive Business Development Unit.” In S. Banks, P. Goodyear, V. Hodgson, and D.
- Brown, J., and Duguid, P. (2002). The Social Life of Information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Burke, L., and Moore, J. (2003). “A perennial dilemma in OB education: Engaging the traditional student.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(1), 37-52.
- Clark, R., and Mayer, R. (2002). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Claudet, J. (2002). “Integrating School Leadership Knowledge and Practice Using Multimedia Technology: Linking National Standards, Assessment, and Professional Development.” Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(1), 29-43.
- Corbeil, P. (1999). “Battleground Gettysburg.” Simulation and Gaming, 30(1), 93-96.
- De Geus, A. (1988). “Planning as Learning.” Harvard Business Review, Mar-Apr, 70-74.
- De Gues, A. (1997). The Living Company: Habits for survival in a turbulent business environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- De Silva, N. (2001). “Providing spatial decision support for evacuation planning: A challenge in integrating technologies.” Disaster Prevention and Management, 10(1),11-20.
- Dixon, N. (2000). Common Knowledge: How companies thrive by sharing what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Driscoll, M., and Carliner, S. (2005). Advanced Web-Based Training Strategies: Unlocking Instructionally Sound Online Learning. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Frankola, K. (2001). “Why online learners drop out.” Workforce, 80(10), 52-58.
- Garrison, R., and Kanuka, H. (2004). “Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education.” The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.
- Garrison, R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. (2000). “Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: A computer conferencing in higher education.” The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. Gibson, C., and Cohen, S. (2003). Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual team Effectiveness. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Gosling, J., and Mintzberg, H. (2004). “The Education of Practicing Managers.” Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 19-22.
- Haines, S. (2000). The Complete Guide to Systems Thinking and Learning. Amherst, MA: HRD Press. Hardless, C., Nilsson, M., and Nulden, U. (2005). “Copernicus: Experiencing a failing project for reflection and Learning.” Management Learning, 36(2), 181-218.
- Harris, L. (2002). “The Learning Organization - Myth or Reality? Examples from the UK retail banking industry.” The Learning Organization, 9(2), 78-88.
- Hassett, J., Ingram, A., Hassett, M., and Marino, E. (2003). “What do Learners Like? Ratings of Off-the-Shelf Web-based training Courses.” International Journal on E-Learning, 2(1), 50-60.
- Hayes, N., and Walsham, G. (2001). “Participation in group-mediated communities of practice: a socio-political analysis of knowledge working.” Information and Organization, 11, 263-288.
- Hobbs, D. (2002). “A Constructivist Approach to Web Course design: A review of the Literature.” International Journal on E-Learning, 1(2), 60-65.
- Hodgson, V. (2002). “Issues for Democracy and Social Identity in CMC and Networked Learning.” In C. Steeples and C. Jones (eds), Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues (pp. 22942). London: Springer-Verlag.
- Hodgson, V., and Watland, P. (2004). “Researching Networked Management Learning.” Management Learning, 35(2), 99-117.
- Jones, J., and Woodcock, M. (1984). A Manual of Management Development. Aldershot, Hampshire, England: Gower Publishing.
- Keys, B., Fulmer, R., and Stumpf, S. (1996). “Microworlds and Simuworlds: Practice fields for the learning organization.” Organizational Dynamics, 24(4), 36-50.
- Knowles, M. (1970). The Modern Practice of Adult Education: Andragogy versus Pedagogy. New York: Association Press.
- Kolb, A., and Kolb, D. (2005). “Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential learning in Higher Education.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.
- Langdon, C., and Sikora, R. (2006). “Conceptualizing co-ordination and competition in supply chains as complex adaptive system.” Information Systems and eBusiness Management, 4(1), 71-86.
- Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Leidner, D., and Jarvenpaa, S. (1995). “The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view.” MIS Quarterly, 19(5), 265-291.
- Lipnack, J., and Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual Teams: Reaching across space, time, and organizations with technology. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Lipnack, J., and Stamps, J. (2000). Virtual Teams: People working across boundaries with technology (2nd edition). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Little, B. (2001). “Achieving high performance through e-learning.” Industrial and Commercial Training, 33(6), 203-207.
- Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Lahav, O., and Oren, A. (2000). “Web-based Learning Environments: Current pedagogical and technological state.” Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(1), 55-76.
- Marsick, V., and Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and Incidental Learning in the Workplace. London, New York: Routledge.
- Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers not MBAs: A hard look at soft practice of managing and management development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
- Morgan, G. (1997). Images of Organization (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Nance, R., and Sargent, R. (2002). “Perspectives on the evolution of simulation.” Operations Research, 50(1), 161-176.
- NewMindsets. (2005a). Why is the distinction between “first” and “second generation” e-learning so important? Retrieved Oct. 8, 2007, from http://www.newmindsets.com/faq/answer9.htm
- Newmindsets. (2005b). What kind of interactivity does one need for great learning? Retrieved Oct. 8, 2007, from http://www.newmindsets.com/faq/answer5.htm
- Osberg, C. (2002). “How to keep e-learners online.” Training & Development, 56(10), 45-47.
- Rosenberg, M. (2001). E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Rosenberg, M. (2006). Beyond E-Learning: Approaches and Technologies to Enhance Organizational Knowledge, Learning, and Performance. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Roth, W. (2004). “A phenomenological anthropology of texts and literacy.” In A. Peacock and A. Cleghorn (eds), Missing The Meaning: The development and use of print and non-print text materials in diverse school settings (pp. 253-266). New York: Palgrave McMillan.
- Rungtusanatham, M., Ellram, L., Siferd, S., and Salik, S. (2004). “Toward a Typology of Business Education in the Internet Age.” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2(2), 101-120. Saint-Onge, H., and Wallace, D. (2003). Leveraging Communities of Practice for Strategic Advantage. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
- Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization. New York: Currency-Doubleday.
- Slocum, M., and Van Buren, M. (2003). E-learning’s learning curve: Will they come, will they learn? Paper presented at ASTD conference, San Diego.
- Stayer, R. (1990). “How I Learned to Let My Workers Lead.” Harvard Business Review, NovDec, 66-83.
- Streufert, S., Satish, U., and Barach, P. (2001). “Improving medical care: The use of simulation technology.” Simulation and Gaming, 32(2), 164-175.
- Tenenbaum, G., Naidu, S., Jegede, O., and Austin, J. (2001). “Constructionist Pedagogy in onventional On-campus and Distance Learning Practice: An Exploratory Investigation.” Learning and Instruction, 11(2), 87-109.
- Thomson Job Impact Study. (2003). “The next generation of corporate learning.” Training and Development, 57(6), 47-48.
- Wang, G., Foucar-Szocki, D., and Griffin, O. (2003). “Departure, Abandonment, and Dropout of E-learning: Dilemma and Solutions.” James Madison University.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Wenger, E. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Wesley, D. (2002). “A Critical Analysis on the Evolution of E-Learning.” International Journal on E-Learning, 1(4), 41-48.
- 3 Further information on the research approach and the results achieved are reported in Adams and Morgan (2007) and in the case study presented later in this article.
- Designing with and for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Evolution of GeoThentic
- Using e-Learning Technologies in Developing Remeditainment Products for the Treatment of Children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD)
- Post degree online course in Haematopathology and e-Learning: description of an innovative curriculum in e-Learning
- Podcasts in Higher Education: What Students Want, What They Really Need, and How This Might be Supported
- Using RSS in Collaborative Course Development
- Teaching for Success: Technology and Learning Styles in Preservice Teacher Education
- Reducing E-Learning Development Costs Using a Streamlined XML-based Approach
- Using Authentic Situations and Avatars to Build Knowledge in an E-Learning Environment
- Inspiring Learning and Teaching: Using e-tools to Facilitate Change
- Five-Picture Charades: A Flexible Model for Technology Training in Digital Media Tools and Teaching Strategies
Comments & Discussion
Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.