Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Journals > AACEJ > Volume 16, Issue 4 >

Gender Differences in Japanese College Students’ Participation in a Qualitative Study

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Scott, D.J. (2008). Gender Differences in Japanese College Students’ Participation in a Qualitative Study. AACE Journal, 16(4), 385-404. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/25234.

OpenURL Link

Journal Information

AACEJ

AACE Journal
ISSN 1065-6901
Volume 16, Issue 4, October 2008
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)  Chesapeake, VA

More Information on AACEJ

Table of Contents


Author

Douglass J. Scott, Waseda University, Japan

Abstract

Lincoln and Guba (1985) reminded us that a qualitative study can change midcourse, taking the researcher into areas of inquiry they did not anticipate at the beginning. This case study was originally designed to ascertain the benefits and limitations of video-equipped cellular telephone use by Japanese college students. When the data were analyzed, however, the most striking results were of gender differences in the way men and women engaged with the research instrument. Data were collected by seven Japanese college students who kept communication logs for one month. Sixteen content categories were developed and analysis revealed that while the men barely met the minimum requirements, the women provided long and detailed log entries. Similarly, men's entries were dominant in only two categories, both of limited content and depth. In contrast, there were four categories where the women's entries clearly outnumbered the men's (two to four times greater) and four categories where the women's entries were both dominant and rich. This clear difference along gender lines was unexpected, but one that it is hoped will spark additional research to better understand how men and women may engage differently in a qualitative study.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.