Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

 
Digital Library > Journals > JILR > Volume 19, Issue 4 >

A Study of Educational Simulations Part II – Interface Design

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Adams, W.K., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., McKagan, S., Perkins, K., Dubson, M. & Wieman, C.E. (2008). A Study of Educational Simulations Part II – Interface Design. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(4), 551-577. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/24364.

OpenURL Link Share on Twitter

Journal Information

JILR

Journal of Interactive Learning Research
ISSN 1093-023X
Volume 19, Issue 4, October 2008
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)  Chesapeake, VA

More Information on JILR

Table of Contents


Authors

Wendy K. Adams, Sam Reid, Ron LeMaster, Sarah McKagan, Katherine Perkins, Michael Dubson, Carl E. Wieman, University of Colorado, USA

Abstract

Interactive computer simulations with complex representations and sophisticated graphics are a relatively new addition to the classroom, and research in this area is limited. We have conducted over 200 individual student interviews during which the students described what they were thinking as they interacted with simulations. These interviews were conducted as part of the research and design of simulations for the Physics Education Technology (PhET) project. PhET is an ongoing project that has developed over 60 simulations for use in teaching physics, chemistry, and physical science. These interviews are a rich source of information about how students interact with computer simulations and what makes an educationally effective simulation. The interviews demonstrate that the simulation must function intuitively or the student's attention is focused on how to use the simulation rather than on the topic presented. Here we provide guidelines for intuitive interface design developed by this research. These cover layout, tool use, help, and representations that we use to create a simulation. We give examples from interviews, which demonstrate the effectiveness of each guideline for engaging students in educationally productive interactions.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@aace.org.