A Quantitative Methodology For Determining the Critical Benchmarks for Project 2061 Strand Maps
New Search | Print Abstract | E-mail Abstract | Full Text | Save to My Collections | Export Citation |
Kuhn, G. (2008). A Quantitative Methodology For Determining the Critical Benchmarks for Project 2061 Strand Maps. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(3), 299-324. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/24200.
Journal Information

Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching
ISSN 0731-9258
Volume 27, Issue 3, July 2008
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) Chesapeake, VA
More Information on JCMST
Author
Abstract
Abstract The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) was tasked with identifying the key science concepts for science literacy in K-12 students in America (AAAS, 1990, 1993). The AAAS Atlas of Science Literacy (2001) has organized roughly half of these science concepts or benchmarks into fifty flow charts. Each flow chart or strand map contains only those AAAS benchmarks relevant to that specific area of K-12 science education. While all the connections and benchmarks are needed for complete K-12 science literacy in that science topic, it is reasonable to assume that some of the blocks and connections are more critical than others. This study develops a quantitative algorithm identifying the specific linear sequence of K-12 benchmarks containing the highest information potential for a subset of Project 2061 strand maps relating to a single topic. As such it represents the shortest and most efficient topical K-12 science-learning path. Science educators should focus their teaching expertise and assessment skills on this defined set of benchmarks in each strand map. It is also where local administrators should focus their funding and science curriculum publishers focus their authoring.
Keywords
- Standards
- Elementary Education
- Secondary Education
- Developmental Stages
- Administrators
- Computer Sciences
- Information Sciences
- Sciences
- Learning Objects
- Teaching Methods
Also Read
- Designing with and for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Evolution of GeoThentic
- Using e-Learning Technologies in Developing Remeditainment Products for the Treatment of Children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD)
- Post degree online course in Haematopathology and e-Learning: description of an innovative curriculum in e-Learning
- Podcasts in Higher Education: What Students Want, What They Really Need, and How This Might be Supported
- Using RSS in Collaborative Course Development
- Teaching for Success: Technology and Learning Styles in Preservice Teacher Education
- Reducing E-Learning Development Costs Using a Streamlined XML-based Approach
- Using Authentic Situations and Avatars to Build Knowledge in an E-Learning Environment
- Inspiring Learning and Teaching: Using e-tools to Facilitate Change
- Scenario making support in PBL
Tags
Add tagComments & Discussion
Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.


New comment