Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Journals > JCMST > Volume 27, Issue 3 >
Login or register for free to remove ads.

A Quantitative Methodology For Determining the Critical Benchmarks for Project 2061 Strand Maps

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Kuhn, G. (2008). A Quantitative Methodology For Determining the Critical Benchmarks for Project 2061 Strand Maps. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(3), 299-324. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/24200.

OpenURL Link

Journal Information

JCMST

Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching
ISSN 0731-9258
Volume 27, Issue 3, July 2008
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)  Chesapeake, VA

More Information on JCMST

Table of Contents


Author

G Kuhn, Tanner Corp., United States

Abstract

Abstract The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) was tasked with identifying the key science concepts for science literacy in K-12 students in America (AAAS, 1990, 1993). The AAAS Atlas of Science Literacy (2001) has organized roughly half of these science concepts or benchmarks into fifty flow charts. Each flow chart or strand map contains only those AAAS benchmarks relevant to that specific area of K-12 science education. While all the connections and benchmarks are needed for complete K-12 science literacy in that science topic, it is reasonable to assume that some of the blocks and connections are more critical than others. This study develops a quantitative algorithm identifying the specific linear sequence of K-12 benchmarks containing the highest information potential for a subset of Project 2061 strand maps relating to a single topic. As such it represents the shortest and most efficient topical K-12 science-learning path. Science educators should focus their teaching expertise and assessment skills on this defined set of benchmarks in each strand map. It is also where local administrators should focus their funding and science curriculum publishers focus their authoring.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.