Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Conference Papers > ELEARN > Volume 2006, Issue 1 >

A web-based tool to enhance evaluation skills of community-based medical school faculty

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

George, J., Bruning, R., Gusic, M., Gingrich, D. & Corson, J. (2006). A web-based tool to enhance evaluation skills of community-based medical school faculty. In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (pp. 1198-1203). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/23870.

OpenURL Link

Conference Information

ELEARN

World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (ELEARN) 2006
Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
October 2006
ISBN 1-880094-60-6
  Thomas Reeves & Shirley Yamashita
AACE

More Information on ELEARN

Table of Contents


Authors

John George, Penn. State College of Medicine, USA; Roger Bruning, University of Nebraska, USA; Maryellen Gusic, Dennis Gingrich, Jane Corson, Penn. State College of Medicine, USA

Abstract

This session will demonstrate an innovative web-based learning tool, LionLearn, used at Penn State College of Medicine. LionLearn employs video presentations to help community-based medical school faculty objectively evaluate medical students during rural rotations. The tool is based on ThinkAbout architecture, which was developed by the Center for Instructional Innovation at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. It uses a case-based learning approach to enhance contextualized problem-solving skills. Users view a medical student's case presentation, make a decision about how to apply evaluation criteria, and give a rationale for their choice. In a second phase, the tool graphically displays frequencies of all users' choices and lists users' and other's rationales. A coach is available to provide helpful hints and an expert gives an authoritative description of how rating criteria should have been applied. Evaluations continue through multiple cycles and cases.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.