Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Conference Papers > ELEARN > Volume 2006, Issue 1 >
Login or register for free to remove ads.

Factors Which Predict Compliance with Accessibility Guidelines for Disabled Users By Higher Education Institutions

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Smith, E.C., McNeese, M.N., Harper, L. & Finneran, S. (2006). Factors Which Predict Compliance with Accessibility Guidelines for Disabled Users By Higher Education Institutions. In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (pp. 922-929). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/23819.

OpenURL Link

Conference Information

ELEARN

World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (ELEARN) 2006
Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
October 2006
ISBN 1-880094-60-6
  Thomas Reeves & Shirley Yamashita
AACE

More Information on ELEARN

Table of Contents


Authors

Elizabeth C. Smith, Mary Nell McNeese, Lin Harper, Sherry Finneran, University of Southern Mississippi, United States

Abstract

This study investigated whether the instructional delivery modes primarily, and the institutional barriers to starting and expanding distance education offerings secondarily, could statistically significantly predict the extent to which the institutional web sites for distance education courses followed established accessibility guidelines/recommendations for users with disabilities. The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) Postsecondary Education Quick Information System (PEQIS) served as the database from which 1,591 U. S. higher education institutions were sampled in the 2000-2001 academic year. Regression results confirmed that instructional delivery modes and institutional barriers combined could predict the extent to which institutional websites complied with accessibility guidelines/recommendations, R2 =. 05, F (27, 1011) = 2.05, p = .001.The instructional modes and institutional barriers that negatively impacted compliance are discussed.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.