Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Conference Papers > ELEARN > Volume 2005, Issue 1 >
Login or register for free to remove ads.

Regular vs. online vs. blended: a qualitative description of the advantages of the electronic modes and a quantitative evaluation

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Tang, M., Byrne, R. & Lippitt, R. (2005). Regular vs. online vs. blended: a qualitative description of the advantages of the electronic modes and a quantitative evaluation. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005 (pp. 442-448). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/21210.

OpenURL Link

Conference Information

ELEARN

World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (ELEARN) 2005
E-Learn 2005--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education
October 2005
ISBN 1-880094-57-6
  Griff Richards
AACE

More Information on ELEARN

Table of Contents


Authors

Michael Tang, Roxanne Byrne, Ronne Lippitt, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, United States

Abstract

This paper describes and evaluates an university engineering experimental project in which courses are delivered in three formats: regular, online and blended. In the description of the three formats we found that teaching in blended and online formats had distinct pedagogical, course development and project management advantages over teaching, developing and managing courses taught in the traditional classroom. In the quantitative part of this paper, we found that students appear to be more or equally satisfied with the blended and online modes of delivery than with the strictly regular classroom format. Many studies have been conducted evaluating online with regular courses. This may be the first that evaluates regular, online and blended courses using ANOVA techniques.

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.