Using Action Research to Determine Technology Effectiveness in Secondary and Postsecondary Settings
PROCEEDINGS
Steven Aragon, James Bartlett, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-47-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
The purpose of this presentation is to give a brief overview of experimental designs that could be implemented in action research projects. In addition, the participants will be involved in an interactive discussion to generate topics that would require decision making using this model.
Citation
Aragon, S. & Bartlett, J. (2003). Using Action Research to Determine Technology Effectiveness in Secondary and Postsecondary Settings. In C. Crawford, N. Davis, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2003--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 661-666). Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/17985/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Aragon, S.R., & Johnson, S.D. (2002). Emerging roles and competencies for training in e-learning environments. Advances in Developing Human Resources (4) 4, 424-439.
- Bocij, P., & Greasley, A. (1999). Can computer-based testing achieve quality and efficiency in assessment? International Journal of Educational Technology, 1(1), 1-18. Retrieved from http://www.outreach.uiuc.edu/ijet/v1n1/bocij/index.html
- Campbell, G.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
- Gay, L. (1996). Educational research competencies for analysis and application. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Greenberg, R. (1998). Online testing. Techniques, 73(3), 26-28. Retrieved from http://47.226.94.254:5239/per?sp.nextform=fullrec.htm & Sp.usernumber.p=459434
- Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D., & Smaldino, S.E. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
- McDonald, M., & Bartlett, J.E., II (2000). Comparison of web-based and traditional delivery methods in a business communications unit. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal,42(2) 90-100.
- McMillan, J.H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
- Miller, L. (1998). Appropriate analysis. Journal of Agricultural Education, 29(2), 1-11.
- Newman, C. (2000). Online testing rated. Advertising-Age, 71(20), 64. Retrieved from http://147.226.94.254:5239/per
- Shermis, M.D., & Lombard, D. (1998). Effects of computer-based test administrations on test anxiety and performance. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. EJ561400)
- Song, J.K. (1998). Using the worldwide web in education and training. Presented at 1998 Information Technology in Education and Training Conference-session 1. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED417703)
- Trochim (2002) Quasi-experimental design. Available at http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/kb/quasiexp.htm
- O’Conner, B. (1990, January). Ask the experts. Business Education Forum. National Business Education Association.
- Reyna, V.F. (2002). Submitted paper: The logic of scientific research. Available at http://www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/esea/research/reyna-paper.html.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Doing what works: Frequently asked questions. Available at http://www.nochildleftbehind.gov/next/faqs/doing.html.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Introduction: No child left behind. Available at http://www.nclb.gov/next/overview/index.html.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References