Four R's for an Artifact: Some Guidelines for the Reflective Component of a Teaching Portfolio PROCEEDINGS
Julie Cloward, Carol Lee Hawkins, Sharon Black, Brigham Young University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA Publisher: AACE, Chesapeake, VA
Technology allows for a wide variety of striking artifacts and easy-to-use archives in which the artifacts can be stored. However, the programs that impliment these resources consistently downplay the element that should be one of their strongest: the reflection. Refelctions should be included to give meaning and significance to each artifact. The proposed session will present this model (summarized for convenience as the Four R's Model: report, reflect, relate, and revise). The presentation will include examples of student work and descriptions of the process, including both ups and downs.
Cloward, J., Hawkins, C.L. & Black, S. (2003). Four R's for an Artifact: Some Guidelines for the Reflective Component of a Teaching Portfolio. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2003 (pp. 22-25). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved March 7, 2014 from http://www.editlib.org/p/17818.
© 2003 AACE