Four R's for an Artifact: Some Guidelines for the Reflective Component of a Teaching Portfolio

New Search

Print Abstract

E-mail Abstract

Full Text

Save to My Collections

Export Citation

Cloward, J., Hawkins, C.L. & Black, S. (2003). Four R's for an Artifact: Some Guidelines for the Reflective Component of a Teaching Portfolio. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2003 (pp. 22-25). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/17818.

• Share:
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Conference Information

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 2003
Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
2003
ISBN 1-880094-47-9
  Caroline Crawford, Niki Davis, Jerry Price, Roberta Weber & Dee Anna Willis
AACE

More Information on SITE
Table of Contents

Authors

Julie Cloward, Carol Lee Hawkins, Sharon Black, Brigham Young University, United States

Abstract

Technology allows for a wide variety of striking artifacts and easy-to-use archives in which the artifacts can be stored. However, the programs that impliment these resources consistently downplay the element that should be one of their strongest: the reflection. Refelctions should be included to give meaning and significance to each artifact. The proposed session will present this model (summarized for convenience as the Four R's Model: report, reflect, relate, and revise). The presentation will include examples of student work and descriptions of the process, including both ups and downs.

Also Read

• A REVIEW OF WEB-BASED LEARNING SYSTEMS FOR PROGRAMMING

Tags