Letting teachers to interact with the idea of “Interactivity”: What is “Interactive?”
PROCEEDINGS
Ozlem Cezikturk, University at Albany, United States ; Gulcin Cirik, San Diego State University, United States ; Murat Kahveci, Florida State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Norfolk, VA ISBN 978-1-880094-41-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
This report is the findings of the research on Interactivity, to find the possible characteristics, contexts, limitations, and ideals, of Interactive Learning Environments for future mathematics and science education areas respectively. A web-based survey was used to gather data on diverse views of the academicians, researchers, and teachers. With the help of their answers and our own questioning, we were able to come up with a four-leave model for Interactivity, with social, intellectual, technical, and physical dimensions constituting the four leaves. We hope that this research would give an idea to teachers for what they should expect from "Interactivity" or not.
Citation
Cezikturk, O., Cirik, G. & Kahveci, M. (2001). Letting teachers to interact with the idea of “Interactivity”: What is “Interactive?”. In J. Price, D. Willis, N. Davis & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2001--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1070-1071). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/16872/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Cezikturk, O., Kahveci, M., & Cirik, G. (2000). Interactivity in Mathematics and science education. MSET 2000., Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, San Diego, CA.
- Duffy, T.M. & Jonassen, D.H. (1992). Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A conversation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: London, UK
- Kirsh, D. (1997). Interactivity and multimedia interfaces. Instructional Science, 25, 79-96.
- Rose, E. (1999). Deconstructing interactivity in educational computing, Educational Technology, 1, 43-49.
- Pressley, M. & McCormick, C. (1995). Cognition, Teaching and Assessment, Harper Collins College Publishers, NewYork, NY. S
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References