A Framework for a Computer System to Support Distributed Cooperative Learning

New Search

Print Abstract

E-mail Abstract

Full Text

Save to My Collections

Export Citation

Chiu, C.H. (2004). A Framework for a Computer System to Support Distributed Cooperative Learning. AACE Journal, 12(1), 9-26. Norfolk, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/1579.

• Share:
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Journal Information

AACE Journal
ISSN 1065-6901
Volume 12, Issue 1, January 2004
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)  Norfolk, VA

More Information on AACEJ

Author

Chiung-Hui Chiu, Institute of Computer and Information Education, N, Taiwan

Abstract

To develop a computer system to support cooperative learning among distributed students; developers should consider the foundations of cooperative learning. This article examines the basic elements that make cooperation work and proposes a framework for such computer supported cooperative learning (CSCL) systems. This framework is constituted of five main components to support cooperative group structures, cooperative task structures, cooperative incentive structures, cooperative space structures, and individual accountability structures. To further guarantee successful cooperative learning, the mechanics to teach or reinforce appropriate cooperative skills should be added. This article provides concrete guidelines to the developers of CSCL systems.

Keywords

• Middle School Education
• Collaboration
• Educational Technology
• Learning Management Systems

References

1. Ahuja, S. R., Ensor, J.R., & Lucco, S.E. (1990, April). A comparison of applications sharing mechanisms in real-time desktop conferencing systems. In Proceedings of the ACM COIS Conference on Office Information Systems (pp. 238-248). Boston.
2. Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
3. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
4. Brush, T.A. (1997). The effects on student achievement and attitudes when using integrated learning systems with cooperative pairs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 51-64.
5. Brush, T.A. (1998). Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 5-18.
6. Denning, R., & Smith, P.J. (1997). Cooperative learning and technology. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(2/3), 177-200.
7. Graves, N.B., & Graves, T.D. (1985). Creating a cooperative learning environment: An ecological approach. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. H. Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 403-436). New York: Plenum.
8. Greenberg, S. (1990, April). Sharing views and interactions with single-user applications. In Proceedings of the ACM COIS Conference on Office Information Systems (pp. 227-237). Boston.
9. Harasim, L.M. (1993). Collaborating in cyberspace: Using computer conferences as a group learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 3(2), 119-130.
10. Harasim, L.M. (1994). Computer networking for education. In T. Husen & T.
11. Hill, S., & Hill, T. (1990). The collaborative classroom: A guide to co-operative learning. Armadale, Victoria, Australia: Eleanor Curtain.
12. Hooper, S. (1992). Cooperative learning and computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 21-38.
13. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1975). Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition and individualization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.
14. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
15. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement.
16. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1991). Learning together and alone. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1992a). Positive interdependency: Key to effective cooperation. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction
18. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1992b). Positive interdependency: The heart of cooperative learning. Edina, MN: Interaction.
19. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1994). Cooperation and the use of technology.
20. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Holubec, E. (1993). Circles of learning (4th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
21. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (1991a). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Report on Higher Education. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
22. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (1991b). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
23. Kagan, S. (1985). Cooperative learning: Resources for teachers. Riverside, CA: University of California.
24. Miller, N., & Harrington, H. J. (1992). Positive interdependency: Key to effective cooperation. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller, (Eds.), Interaction
25. Patterson, J.F., Hill, R.D., Rohall, S L., & Meeks, W.S. (1990, October). Rendezvous: An architecture for synchronous multi-user applications. In Proceedings of the ACM CSCW Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles, California.
26. Putnam, J.W., Rynders, J.E., Johnson, R.T., & Johnson, D.W. (1989). Collaborative skill instruction for promoting positive interactions between mentally
27. Riel, M., & Levin, J. (1990). Building electronic communities: Successes and failures in computer networking. Instructional Science, 19(2), 145-169.
28. Rysavy, S., & Sales, G.C. (1991). Cooperative learning in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(2), 70-79.
29. Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Columbia University.
30. Sherman, G.P., & Klein, J.D. (1995). The effects of cued interaction and ability grouping during cooperative computer-based science instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(4), 5-24.
31. Slavin, R.E. (1983). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.
32. Slavin, R.E. (1984). Students motivating students to excel: Cooperative incentives, cooperative tasks, and student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 85(1), 53-65.
33. Slavin, R.E. (1986). Using student team learning (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns
34. Slavin, R.E. (1991a). Group rewards make groupwork work. Educational Leadership, 48(5), 89-91.
35. Slavin, R.E. (1991b). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48(5), 71-82.
36. Slavin, R.E. (1993). Cooperative learning and achievement: An empiricallybased theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
37. Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
38. Stahl, R.J. (1994). The essential elements of cooperative learning in the classroom. ERIC Digest. Abstract from: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/
39. Tateyama-Sniezek, K.M. (1990). Cooperative learning: Does it improve the academic achievement of students with handicaps? Exceptional Children, 56, 426-437.
40. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Vygotsky, L.S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch
42. Watson, S.B. (1992). The essential elements of cooperative learning. The American Biology Teacher, 54(2), 84-86.
43. Watson, S.B., & Marshall, J.E. (1995). Effects of cooperative incentives and heterogeneous arrangement on achievement and interaction of cooperative

Also Read

• Perspectives on Blended Learning in Higher Education
• Impact of Online e-Learning Modules Supported by Cooperative Learning Activities on Qatar University Students’ Achievement and Communication Skills
• Strategic Blending: A Conceptual Framework to Improve Learning and Performance
• A New Pathway for E-Learning: From Distribution to Collaboration and Competence in E-Learning
• How a Blended Approach for Job-embedded Learning has led Teachers to Recognize and Reflect upon the Unique Intersections of Content, Technology, and Classroom Practice in the Advanced Broadband Enabled Learning (ABEL) Program.
• Lessons Learned from Offering a Technologically Mediated Job-Embedded Professional Learning Program to Teachers
• Finding a Balance in Dimensions of Blended Learning
• Social Processes and Pedagogy in Online Learning
• Evaluating Effectiveness of E-Blackboard System Using TAM Framework: A Structural Analysis Approach
• Technology and Student Learning: Towards a Learner-Centered Teaching Model

Tags