Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Journals > JTATE > Volume 10, Issue 3 >

Gender Differences in Teacher Computer Acceptance

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Yuen, A.H.K. & Ma, W.W.K. (2002). Gender Differences in Teacher Computer Acceptance. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 365-382. Norfolk, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/15142.

OpenURL Link

Journal Information

JTATE

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education
ISSN 1059-7069
Volume 10, Issue 3, 2002
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)  Norfolk, VA

More Information on JTATE

Table of Contents


Authors

Allan H.K. Yuen, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Will W.K. Ma, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong

Abstract

Teachers' computer acceptance is an important factor to the successful use of computers in education. This article explores the gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used as the framework to determine if such differences are present. Survey questionnaires were administered to 186 preservice teachers, the questionnaire consists of two independent variables (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use), together with the dependent variable (intention to use). The results of model testing using LISREL indicated that the two independent variables, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, directly affect the intention to computer use as stated in the TAM. Furthermore, significant gender differences in computer acceptance were also found: (a) perceived usefulness will influence intention to use computers more strongly for females than males, (b) perceived ease of use will influence intention to use computers more strongly for females than males, and (c) perceived ease of use will influence perceived usefulness more strongly for males than females. Impacts and implications to teacher professional development are also discussed.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.