"Army" as a Second Language: The Critical Nature of Communicating with Clients
New Search | Print Abstract | E-mail Abstract | Full Text | Save to My Collections | Export Citation |
Miller, K.H. & Rude-Parkins, D.C. (2004). "Army" as a Second Language: The Critical Nature of Communicating with Clients. In J. Nall & R. Robson (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004 (pp. 128-132). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/11329.
Conference Information

World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (ELEARN) 2004
Washington, DC, USA
2004
ISBN 1-880094-54-1
Janice Nall & Robby Robson
AACE
More Information on ELEARN
Table of Contents
Authors
Abstract
The University of Louisville and Northrop Grumman Mission Systems partnership to produce distance education courseware for the US Army introduced some unexpcted communications problems. While the Northrop Grumman team was well versed in Army language, the U of L team had a great deal to learn. This brief paper discusses not only the simple issues such as acronyms and writing style, but also the far more complex issue of instructional design constructs. Mutual understanding is critical to successful communication between the contractor and the client. We have realized that it is not a question of right and wrong, but of agreement on the use of language. As contractors, we learned to accept that a Terminal Learning Objective (TLO) was what we would call a goal; an Enabling Learning Objective (ELO) was a lesson; and that the Learning Activity actually contained the measurable objectives. You can only please a client when you understand them, and that must be SOP.
Keywords
Also Read
- Design and Integration of an Automated Assessment Laboratory: Experiences and Guide
- 3D Spaces in Software Engineering: From K-12 to Life Long Learning
- e-CAF: Flexible Marking Schemes for Electronic Coursework Assessment and Feedback
- Connecting Students by Integrating the 3D Virtual and Real Worlds:We Need 3D Open Source Spaces to Keep Socialization, Communication and Collaboration alive
- A REVIEW OF WEB-BASED LEARNING SYSTEMS FOR PROGRAMMING
- Distributed e-Portfolios to Recognise Informal Learning
- Australis 4 Learning: Benefits and Outcomes of a Second Life Simulation for the Automated Assessment Laboratory
Tags
Add tagComments & Discussion
Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.


New comment