Login or register for free to remove ads.
You are here:

E-learning pedagogy: The reveal of value adding learning processes. Definitions and Implications for dynamic learning content delivery PROCEEDINGS

, Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Montreal, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-46-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

E-learning seems to suffer from the heritage of many “e- Ethings that in the last decade formulate the new business environment. The overestimation of the role of technology causes a misunderstanding concerning the key issues in e-learning (Lytras and Pouloudi 2001). Our approach for e-learning recognizes three dimensions as the critical pillars that have a direct impact in e-learning performance: E-learning pedagogy (Lytras and Doukidis 2001), (Lytras and Doukidis 2000) , knowledge management (Lytras and Doukidis 2000), (Lytras, Pouloudi et al. 2002), (Lytras, Pouloudi et al. 2002) and Application Integration. This paper focuses on E-learning pedagogy. Our intention is to provide a thoroughly analysis of parameters that justify a pedagogical strategy for e-leanring exploitation. The ultimate objective is to investigate the role of specific learning process in the exploitation of learning content and in the support of dynamic unique learning experiences.

Citation

Lytras, M. (2002). E-learning pedagogy: The reveal of value adding learning processes. Definitions and Implications for dynamic learning content delivery. In M. Driscoll & T. Reeves (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2002 (pp. 1826-1830). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Keywords

References

  1. Bloom and Krathwohl (1984). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, Addison-Wesley and Co.
  2. Coulson, C. (2000). “Developing a corporate learning strategy.” Industrial & Commercial Training Vol. 32(No. 3): 8488.
  3. Ryan, M. (1995). “Human resource management and the politics of knowledge:linking the essential knowledge base of the organization to strategic decision making.” Leadership and Organizational Development Journal Vol. 16(No. 5).
  4. Shuell, T. J. (1992). Designing instructional computing systems for meaningful learning. In M. Jones & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Adaptive learning environments: Foundations and frontiers, New York: Springer- Verlag, pp.19-54.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.