To view the full text of this article...
Subscribe for faster access!
Subscribe for only $19/month (or $150/year) and receive immediate access to 20,000+ documents/media files.
Purchase individual articles and papers
Purchase fulltext access to individual articles and papers for $9.95 USD each. You can purchase as a guest or save your information for faster access later.
Already have an account?
Institutions
If you are accessing the system through an institution or library, find out if they have a subscription to the digital library. If they do, please have them contact us with the IP address for this machine: 38.107.179.218.
Online Assessment Criteria in Action: Task Design in Contrasting Tertiary Education Contexts
New Search | Print Abstract | E-mail Abstract | Full Text | Save to My Collections | Export Citation |
Kendle, A. & Northcote, M. (2001). Online Assessment Criteria in Action: Task Design in Contrasting Tertiary Education Contexts. In C. Montgomerie & J. Viteli (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2001 (pp. 920-924). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/8695.
Conference Information

World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (EDMEDIA) 2001
Norfolk, VA
2001
ISBN 1-880094-42-8
Craig Montgomerie & Jarmo Viteli
AACE
More Information on EDMEDIA
Table of Contents
Authors
Abstract
Our previous research provided a theoretical basis for a proposed set of practical design criteria for online assessment tasks. This work has been motivated by our recognition of the importance of not simply transferring face-to-face or distance learning assessment techniques to the online environment. We work largely in a constructivist framework and the key components of our design criteria include using a variety of qualitative and quantitative assessment activities, designing authentic tasks, using collaboration and interaction, providing appropriate feedback mechanisms, utilising online resources, and encouraging student responsibility for and control of the learning process. In this paper two case studies are used to illustrate the application of these criteria, and their effectiveness as online assessment tasks is evaluated. The first case study involves an online portfolio assessment in an Indigenous Australian literature unit, while the second looks at the adaptation of the modified essay question to the online environment in a medical education context. The results of our analysis will inform both the refinement of our design criteria and the development of future assessment tasks.
Keywords
Also Read
- Exploring the Effect of Computer Mediated Communication Tools on Online Learners’ Participation and Learning: A Review of Research
- Situated Cognition and Problem-Based Learning: Implications for Learning and Instruction with Technology
- A Review of Research on Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Implemented Through Distance Education (DE) Environments
- Problem-based Learning in an Online IT Professional Practice Course
- Constructivist Online Learning Environments (COLE): A Methodological Analysis
- A CRITICAL REVIEW Of CURRENT RESEARCH On ON-LINE COLLABORATIVE PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
- The Role of Technology in Support of Problem-Based Learning in Online Learning Environments
- Practical Guidelines for Collaboration-based Learning in Synchronous Online Environments
- Course Management Systems as Tools for the Creation of Online Learning Environments:Evaluation from a Social Constructivist Perspective and Implications for their Design
- First things first: Technologies to facilitate group formation in online problem-based learning
Tags
Add tagComments & Discussion
Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.

New comment