Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

To view the full text of this article...

Subscribe for faster access!

Subscribe for only $19/month (or $150/year) and receive immediate access to 20,000+ documents/media files.

Purchase individual articles and papers

Purchase fulltext access to individual articles and papers for $9.95 USD each. You can purchase as a guest or save your information for faster access later.

Already have an account?

Individual Accounts

Institutions

If you are accessing the system through an institution or library, find out if they have a subscription to the digital library. If they do, please have them contact us with the IP address for this machine: 54.234.180.187.

Digital Library >
Login or register for free to remove ads.

Students’ use of Self-regulatory Tool and Critical Inquiry in Online Discussions

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Bai, H. (2012). Students’ use of Self-regulatory Tool and Critical Inquiry in Online Discussions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 23(3), 209-225. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/37588.

OpenURL Link

Journal Information

JILR

Journal of Interactive Learning Research
ISSN 1093-023X
Volume 23, Issue 3, July 2012
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)  Chesapeake, VA

More Information on JILR

Table of Contents


Author

Hua Bai, Northeastern Illinois University, United States

Abstract

Facilitating students’ critical thinking in asynchronous discussions is important in online learning environments. Since students need to be self-regulated in online learning, the instructors are expected to scaffold students by providing structure and guidance. This paper discusses critical inquiry in two groups of students’ online discussions. One group of the students received training in using the practical inquiry model to regulate their online discourse and code their posts. The other group of the students were informed of the model, but were not trained to use the model as a self-regulatory tool and code online posts. It was found that the former group of the students demonstrated higher level critical thinking more frequently than the latter group of the students. The results indicated that using the model as a self-regulatory tool by the students could facilitate their critical inquiry in online asynchronous discussions. Training students to use the model for self-regulation is also discussed in this paper.

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.