Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

To view the full text of this article...

Subscribe for faster access!

Subscribe for only $19/month (or $150/year) and receive immediate access to 20,000+ documents/media files.

Purchase individual articles and papers

Purchase fulltext access to individual articles and papers for $9.95 USD each. You can purchase as a guest or save your information for faster access later.

Already have an account?

Individual Accounts

Institutions

If you are accessing the system through an institution or library, find out if they have a subscription to the digital library. If they do, please have them contact us with the IP address for this machine: 72.44.48.122.

Digital Library >
Login or register for free to remove ads.

A comparison between Flash and Second Life programmes as aids in the learning of basic laboratory procedures.

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Booth, P. & Henderson-Begg, S. (2011). A comparison between Flash and Second Life programmes as aids in the learning of basic laboratory procedures. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 22(3), 445-465. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/33219.

OpenURL Link

Journal Information

JILR

Journal of Interactive Learning Research
ISSN 1093-023X
Volume 22, Issue 3, July 2011
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)  Chesapeake, VA

More Information on JILR

Table of Contents


Authors

Paula Booth, Stephanie Henderson-Begg, University of East London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Invited as a paper from E-Learn 2009 This study compared two programmes developed as a learning tool for students to practise basic laboratory procedures. One was a Flash simulation programme, the other a Second Life virtual reality programme. A cohort of 93 bioscience students participated in the between trial. A control group was used to establish if using either programme affected learning or confidence gains. Gains were assessed by collecting pre-demo and post-demo scores. Results showed no difference in gains between the Flash and Second Life conditions but both had significantly higher confidence gains than the control condition. However, the control group had a significantly higher pre-demo score casting some doubt on the reliability of the result. Students scored Flash significantly higher as a learning tool in an evaluation questionnaire. Furthermore, comments from the focus group demonstrated that the majority of students preferred to use Flash finding it easier to use, quicker and with less distractions than Second Life. The University of East London will now focus upon developing the Flash version of the laboratory procedures simulation.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.