To view the full text of this article...
Subscribe for faster access!
Subscribe for only $19/month (or $150/year) and receive immediate access to 20,000+ documents/media files.
Purchase individual articles and papers
Purchase fulltext access to individual articles and papers for $9.95 USD each. You can purchase as a guest or save your information for faster access later.
Already have an account?
Institutions
If you are accessing the system through an institution or library, find out if they have a subscription to the digital library. If they do, please have them contact us with the IP address for this machine: 38.107.179.218.
Reflective Cycle for Instructional Design: Sustainable Improvement Model for Online Courses
 New Search |  Print Abstract |  E-mail Abstract |  Full Text |  Save to My Collections |  Export Citation |
Mochizuki, T., Goda, Y., Iwasaki, F., Matsuda, T. & Tamaki, K. (2007). Reflective Cycle for Instructional Design: Sustainable Improvement Model for Online Courses. In T. Bastiaens & S. Carliner (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (pp. 394-398). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/26358.
Conference Information
World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (ELEARN) 2007
Quebec City, Canada
October 15, 2007
ISBN 1-880094-63-0
Theo Bastiaens & Saul Carliner
AACE
More Information on ELEARN
Table of Contents
Authors
Abstract
This paper describes the evaluation cycle for online courses that are intended to achieve sustainable improvement. Aoyama Gakuin University has established an online course program and a course evaluation cycle to improve the courses. The initial evaluation cycle that focused on independent course evaluation was performed as part of the online program for two semesters. The examination of the improvement between the semesters revealed that the reflection of the instruction team as practitioners influenced actual improvements in the course. Finally, the paper describes the revised course evaluation cycle in order to reflect the practitioners' visions.
Also Read
- Technology Integration: PDAs as an Instructional and Reflective Tool in the Science Classroom
- Collaborative Example Authoring System: The Value of Re-annotation based on Community Feedback
- Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Preservice Teachers Through Microteaching Lesson Study
- A REVIEW OF WEB-BASED LEARNING SYSTEMS FOR PROGRAMMING
- Third generation educational use of computer games
- ProBoPortable: Development of Cellular Phone Software to Prompt Learners to Monitor and Reorganize Division of Labor in Project-Based Learning
- Beyond Journals: Using Digital Storytelling to Encourage Meaningful Teacher Reflection
- PDAs in Teacher Education: A Case Study Examining Mobile Technology Integration
- Using Mobile Phones and QR Codes for Formative Class Evaluation and Better Learning for College Students.
- First steps and beyond: Serious games as preparation for future learning
Tags
Add tagComments & Discussion
Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.
New comment