To view the full text of this article...
Subscribe for faster access!
Subscribe for only $19/month (or $150/year) and receive immediate access to 20,000+ documents/media files.
Purchase individual articles and papers
Purchase fulltext access to individual articles and papers for $9.95 USD each. You can purchase as a guest or save your information for faster access later.
Already have an account?
Institutions
If you are accessing the system through an institution or library, find out if they have a subscription to the digital library. If they do, please have them contact us with the IP address for this machine: 38.107.179.217.
A Formative Analysis of Instructional Strategies for Using Learning Objects
New Search | Print Abstract | E-mail Abstract | Full Text | Save to My Collections | Export Citation |
Kay, R., Knaack, L. & Muirhead, B. (2009). A Formative Analysis of Instructional Strategies for Using Learning Objects. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(3), 295-315. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/26233.
Journal Information

Journal of Interactive Learning Research
ISSN 1093-023X
Volume 20, Issue 3, July 2009
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) Chesapeake, VA
More Information on JILR
Authors
Abstract
To date, limited research has been done examining and evaluating the instructional wrap for using learning objects effectively. The current study examined instructional strategies used by 15 teachers to integrate learning objects into 30 secondary school classrooms (510 students). Four key areas were examined: preparation time, purpose for using a learning object, integration strategies, and time spent using a learning object. A small, but significant, correlation was observed between preparation time and student attitudes toward learning objects. When the purpose of using a learning object was to introduce a concept before a formal lesson, motivate students, or teach a new concept, student attitudes and performance were significantly higher. On the other hand, choosing to use a learning object after a formal lesson or to review a concept resulted in significantly lower student attitudes and performance. Regarding integration strategies, providing a guiding set of questions was associated with more positive student attitudes and increased performance, whereas allowing students to explore on their own (without direction) and class discussion after use led to significantly lower student attitudes and performance. Finally, time spent using learning objects was inversely correlated with student attitudes and performance. It is reasonable to conclude that decisions about instructional wrap had a significant impact on the effectiveness of learning objects in a secondary school environment.
Keywords
- Secondary Education
- Mathematics
- Sciences
- Educational Technology
- Instructional Design
- Instructional Materials
- Learning Objects
- Learning Outcomes
- Teaching Methods
Also Read
- Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2009
- The Connected Learning Space
- Learning Objects in Context
- A Special Passage Through Asia E-Learning
- Usage Analysis in Learning Systems
- Supporting E-Learning with Technologies for Electronic Documents
- Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2010
- Technology, Transfer and Teaching: The Impact of a Single Technology Course on Preservice Teachers’ Computer Attitudes and Ability
- Strategies for teacher professional development on TPACK, Part 2
- The International Handbook Summit Call to Action for Learning with Technology in the 21st Century
Tags
Add tagComments & Discussion
Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.

New comment