Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

To view the full text of this article...

Subscribe for faster access!

Subscribe for only $19/month (or $150/year) and receive immediate access to 20,000+ documents/media files.

Purchase individual articles and papers

Purchase fulltext access to individual articles and papers for $9.95 USD each. You can purchase as a guest or save your information for faster access later.

Already have an account?

Individual Accounts

Institutions

If you are accessing the system through an institution or library, find out if they have a subscription to the digital library. If they do, please have them contact us with the IP address for this machine: 38.107.179.220.

Digital Library >

Building-In Quality Rather Than Assessing Quality Afterwards: A Technological Solution to Ensuring Computational Accuracy in Learning Materials

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Dunn, P. (2008). Building-In Quality Rather Than Assessing Quality Afterwards: A Technological Solution to Ensuring Computational Accuracy in Learning Materials. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(1), 47-63. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/23619.

OpenURL Link

Journal Information

JCMST

Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching
ISSN 0731-9258
Volume 27, Issue 1, January 2008
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)  Chesapeake, VA

More Information on JCMST

Table of Contents


Author

Peter Dunn, University of Southern Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Quality encompasses a very broad range of ideas in learning materials, yet the accuracy of the content is often overlooked as a measure of quality. Various aspects of accuracy are briefly considered, and the issue of computational accuracy is then considered further. When learning materials are produced containing the results of mathematical computations, accuracy is essential: but how can the results of these computations be known to be correct? A solution is to embed the instructions for performing the calculations in the materials, and let the computer calculate the result and place it in the text. In this way, quality is built into the learning materials by design, not evaluated after the event. This is all accomplished using the ideas of literate programming, applied to the learning materials context. A small example demonstrates how remarkably easy the ideas are to apply in practice using the appropriate technology. Given the technology is available and is easy to use, it would seem imperative the approach discussed is adopted to improve quality in learning materials containing computational results.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.