To view the full text of this article...
Subscribe for faster access!
Subscribe for only $19/month (or $150/year) and receive immediate access to 20,000+ documents/media files.
Purchase individual articles and papers
Purchase fulltext access to individual articles and papers for $9.95 USD each. You can purchase as a guest or save your information for faster access later.
Already have an account?
Institutions
If you are accessing the system through an institution or library, find out if they have a subscription to the digital library. If they do, please have them contact us with the IP address for this machine: 38.107.179.218.
Investigation of the “Convince Me” Computer Environment as a Tool for Critical Argumentation about Public Policy Issues
New Search | Print Abstract | E-mail Abstract | Full Text | Save to My Collections | Export Citation |
Adams, S.T. (2003). Investigation of the “Convince Me” Computer Environment as a Tool for Critical Argumentation about Public Policy Issues. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(3), 263-283. Norfolk, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/2309.
Journal Information

Journal of Interactive Learning Research
ISSN 1093-023X
Volume 14, Issue 3, July 2003
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) Norfolk, VA
More Information on JILR
Author
Abstract
The Convince Me computer environment supports critical thinking by allowing users to create and evaluate computer-based representations of arguments. This study investigates theoretical and design considerations pertinent to using Convince Me as an educational tool to support reasoning about public policy issues. Among computer environments designed to support argumentation, Convince Me is unique in that it computes a measure of an argument's coherence and presents this information to users as feedback. This measure is based on the ECHO computational model, a connectionist implemenation of the Theory of Explanatory Coherence. The study seeks to better understand this coherent argumentation measure by comparing it to other measures including a measure of the stability of one's views and the number of statements in an argument. Ten 17-year-old students and one scientist used Convince Me to create arguments about policies designed to ameliorate global warming; they also participated in pre- and post-intervention surveys and interviews. Positive correlations were found among the coherent argumentation measure, measures of stability, and number of statements in an argument, and these findings raise considerations for designing educational activities with Convince Me. A debriefing interview's results illustrate further considerations, including the role of the user's stance towards the software.
Keywords
Also Read
- July 2009 - Social Media: Trends and Implications for Learning
- Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2009
- The Connected Learning Space
- Is E-Learning True to the Principles of Technology?
- Usage Analysis in Learning Systems
- Preparing Teachers to Teach Mathematics with Technology: Key Issues, Concerns and Research Questions
- The intractability of information: non-governmental development organizations and the uses of knowledge
- Learning and Teaching with Electronic Games
- Learning in a Networked World: Trends and Opportunities in the Future of Technology for Learning Environments and Education
- Supporting E-Learning with Technologies for Electronic Documents
Tags
Add tagComments & Discussion
Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.

New comment