Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

To view the full text of this article...

Subscribe for faster access!

Subscribe for only $19/month (or $150/year) and receive immediate access to 20,000+ documents/media files.

Purchase individual articles and papers

Purchase fulltext access to individual articles and papers for $9.95 USD each. You can purchase as a guest or save your information for faster access later.

Already have an account?

Individual Accounts

Institutions

If you are accessing the system through an institution or library, find out if they have a subscription to the digital library. If they do, please have them contact us with the IP address for this machine: 54.224.79.93.

Digital Library >
Login or register for free to remove ads.

Interactivity in Mathematics and Science Education

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Cezikturk, O., Kahveci, M. & Cirik, G. (2000). Interactivity in Mathematics and Science Education. In Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematics / Science Education and Technology 2000 (pp. 106-111). AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/15425.

OpenURL Link

Conference Information

MSET

International Conference on Mathematics / Science Education and Technology (MSET) 2000
2000
AACE

Table of Contents


Authors

Ozlem Cezikturk, State University of NewYork at Albany, United States; Murat Kahveci, Florida State University, United States; Gulcin Cirik, San Diego State University, United States

Abstract

Today, interactivity is seen as a key factor for achieving effective learning environments. Research says that "Interactivity" is a messy idea that takes its meaning from a system of metaphysical oppositions. These oppositions range from learner control issue to the debate. A group of academicians and researchers were asked to imagine a "Richly Interactive Learning Environment" to the fullest degree possible. The commonalities and differences in their ideas are investigated in order to come up with a shared understanding of interactivity for the new millennium. The aim of this article, is to both deconstruct and reconstruct a theory for interactivity with some real ground from previous research, ideas from that group, and from the ideas of the authors, as a whole. With this framework in hand, we hope that it will be possible to differentiate the real promises of "interactivity" from the wonderland promises.

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.