Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

To view the full text of this article...

Subscribe for faster access!

Subscribe for only $19/month (or $150/year) and receive immediate access to 20,000+ documents/media files.

Purchase individual articles and papers

Purchase fulltext access to individual articles and papers for $9.95 USD each. You can purchase as a guest or save your information for faster access later.

Already have an account?

Individual Accounts

Institutions

If you are accessing the system through an institution or library, find out if they have a subscription to the digital library. If they do, please have them contact us with the IP address for this machine: 184.73.74.47.

Digital Library >
Login or register for free to remove ads.

Comparative Study of Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Case Discussions

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Levin, B., Robbins, H. & Ye, H. (2004). Comparative Study of Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Case Discussions. In R. Ferdig et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2004 (pp. 551-558). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/13529.

OpenURL Link

Conference Information

SITE

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 2004
Atlanta, GA, USA
2004
ISBN 1-880094-52-5
  Richard Ferdig, Caroline Crawford, Roger Carlsen, Niki Davis, Jerry Price, Roberta Weber & Dee Anna Willis
AACE

More Information on SITE

Table of Contents


Authors

Barbara Levin, Holly Robbins, He Ye, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, United States

Abstract

This study compares preservice teachers' preferences during online case discussions for synchronous vs. asynchronous modes and facilitation by peers or the instructor during a web-supported course on classroom management. Findings from surveys indicated that participants' strong initial preference for asynchronous discussions changed by the end of the semester, but preferences for peer vs. instructor facilitation remained about the same. Means for participants' initial and final responses to a dilemma-based case were statistically higher in a re-analysis of the case. An analysis of participants' responses as to why and/or how their thinking about the case changed or remained the same during the semester is provided. Explanations of participants' preferences for synchronous vs. asynchronous and peer or instructor-facilitated online case discussions are also provided.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.