To view the full text of this article...
Subscribe for faster access!
Subscribe for only $19/month (or $150/year) and receive immediate access to 20,000+ documents/media files.
Purchase individual articles and papers
Purchase fulltext access to individual articles and papers for $9.95 USD each. You can purchase as a guest or save your information for faster access later.
Already have an account?
Institutions
If you are accessing the system through an institution or library, find out if they have a subscription to the digital library. If they do, please have them contact us with the IP address for this machine: 38.107.179.218.
Critical Race Theory and the Digital Divide: Beyond the Rhetoric
New Search | Print Abstract | E-mail Abstract | Full Text | Save to My Collections | Export Citation |
Leigh, P. (2002). Critical Race Theory and the Digital Divide: Beyond the Rhetoric. In D. Willis et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2002 (pp. 384-388). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/10039.
Conference Information

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 2002
Nashville, Tennessee, USA
2002
ISBN 1-880094-44-4
Dee Anna Willis, Jerry Price & Niki Davis
AACE
More Information on SITE
Table of Contents
Author
Abstract
In this paper, the author uses the philosophical lens of Critical Race Theory (CRT) to shed light upon the vast inequalities in access to information technologies that exists among racial, ethnic and socio-economic groups; a phenomenon that has come to be known as the digital divide. This paper focuses primarily on how the digital divide has played out for African Americans and allows CRT to explain the history of inequalities and why significant differences in educational opportunities have persisted into the 21st century. The author adopts the term 'analog divide' to refer to all the non computer/telecommunications based educational inequities that African Americans have experienced for decades and even centuries. She further purports that one cannot understand or begin to rectify the digital divide unless one is willing to fully confront and attack the problem of the analog divide that preceded it and continues to persist. The three major tenets of CRT that serve to illuminate these divides are the claims that: 1) racism is ingrained in the fabric of American society to the extent that it is invisible to most and racist behaviors and attitudes therefore seem normal to the average citizen, 2) social justice for historically oppressed groups of Americans will only be achieved when such advances also benefit the dominant power holders, and lastly 3) the perspectives and stances of marginalized groups are many times best represented in the form of narratives, storytelling and counter-storytelling. In this paper the author begins in using the third tenet of CRT by presenting the reader with an allegory entitled, Crossing the Great Divide: A Tale of Analog and Digital Inequity. In this tale one finds two groups of trolls, with the two-headed trolls dominating and enslaving the one-headed trolls. As the story unfolds, the reader sees how the oppressed trolls become caught in a cycle of poverty and oppression and stuck in a land that weakens them and deprives them of the energy to cross over the great divide into more fertile fields. The dominant trolls, having given up their brutally overt oppressive ways after crossing the divide into lands where slave labor is no longer needed, soon forget why they had the energy and fortitude to cross the divide whereas the one-headed trolls did not. In fact, because of the hybrid food crop (knowledge) that the oppressed trolls have been forced to ingest, they too have forgotten why they have been left behind and stuck in a cycle of backbreaking work and struggle. The tale ends with a group of concerned but amnesiac trolls holding council concerning ways and means to bring more weakened and impoverished trolls across the divide into the rich soil of the northern region. The author analyzes the tale and suggests to the reader possible means in which educators today might seek to close gaps in access to educational opportunities afforded Black and White Americans. She specifically asks technology educators to own the problem of the analog divide as well as the digital divide and to work in the greater society as well as in their specific field in seeking justice and equality.
Keywords
Also Read
- Design and Integration of an Automated Assessment Laboratory: Experiences and Guide
- 3D Spaces in Software Engineering: From K-12 to Life Long Learning
- e-CAF: Flexible Marking Schemes for Electronic Coursework Assessment and Feedback
- Connecting Students by Integrating the 3D Virtual and Real Worlds:We Need 3D Open Source Spaces to Keep Socialization, Communication and Collaboration alive
- A Participatory Approach to Scenario Development for XO Laptops in Brazil
- Living the Digital Divide: Technology Infusion as One Goal of an Urban Middle School Restructuring Project
- Engaging the 21st Century Learner in P-12 Course Content: Creating Technology-Rich Teacher Education Programs
- Is Your University Ready For the Ne(x)t-Generation?
- MIDDLE SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION STUDY
- Mistaking Computers for Technology: Technology Literacy and the Digital Divide
Tags
Add tagComments & Discussion
Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.

New comment