Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

 
Digital Library > Conference Papers > EDMEDIA > Volume 2004, Issue 1 >

Improving ability in presentations through multivoiced mutual reviewing activity: A dialogic approach to persuasive communication

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Suzuki, H., Funaoi, H., Mochizuki, T., Yoshino, S. & Kato, H. (2004). Improving ability in presentations through multivoiced mutual reviewing activity: A dialogic approach to persuasive communication. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2004 (pp. 3203-3208). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/12479.

OpenURL Link Share on Twitter

Conference Information

EDMEDIA

World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (EDMEDIA) 2004
Lugano, Switzerland
2004
  Lorenzo Cantoni & Catherine McLoughlin
AACE

More Information on EDMEDIA

Table of Contents


Authors

Hideyuki Suzuki, Hideo Funaoi, Faculty of Humanities, Ibaraki University, Japan; Toshio Mochizuki, Information Science and Technology Center, Kobe University, Japan; Shiho Yoshino, College of Letters, Ritsumeikan University, Japan; Hiroshi Kato, National Institute of Multimedia Education, Japan

Abstract

In this paper, a multivoiced view of presentations is proposed. From the multivoiced perspective of the presentation, the process of presentation is viewed as the process of dialogue between the speaker and the audience (both real and imaginary). Based on the multivoiced view of presentations, a "multivoiced mutual reviewing activity" is proposed as a strategy to improve ability in presenting. Multivoiced mutual reviewing is an activity in which learners mutually review their presentations/ideas not from their own viewpoint but from various viewpoints given by the instructor. A comparative study shows that presentations made by learners who went through multivoiced mutual reviewing activity were given a higher score by the evaluators including the instructors of the classes than the learners who did usual mutual reviewing that required them to review from their own viewpoint.

Keywords

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@aace.org.