Course Evaluation
Compiled by Stefanie Panke
 E-mail Collection |  Export Citations |  Save Collection |
Tags
Topics:
In this collection:
| Wall, A. (2012). Measuring Teacher Education Standards: The Journey toward Authentic Electronic Assessment. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 3963-3967). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. | View | |
| This paper is a reflective overview of the assessment of teacher education standards in the College of Education at a mid-sized Southeastern university during the past decade. The transition from hard copy portfolios to using LiveText to create electronic versions of portfolios, key assessments, and authentic teacher performance assessments has been rapid and not without obstacles. This overview of the evolution of our standards assessment examines the strengths and weaknesses of the different forms of assessments we have used, what we have learned about standards assessment, and what the next steps will be for more authentic assessment of teacher education students. | ||
| Hughes, M. & Walker, L. (2001). Just Another Evaluation Paper: Working Towards a Shared Methodology for Evaluation of Information Technology Courses in Teacher Education. In J. Price et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2001 (pp. 2334-2335). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. | View | |
| In response to a perceived increase in the amount of course evaluations being presented at conferences and appearing in the journals, this short paper seeks to characterise the methodology adopted during the evaluation of information technology courses forming part of teacher pre-service education. An attempt is made to discover the strengths and weaknesses of the most common procedures by the review of course evaluations readily available in the public domain. Elements of course evaluation are described in a short taxonomy under the main headings of curriculum effectiveness, learning effectiveness and cost effectiveness. | ||
