Skip navigation

Home | About | Contact

Digital Library > Conference Papers > EDMEDIA > Volume 2006, Issue 1 >
Login or register for free to remove ads.

A Framework for the Assessing of Intercultural Communicative Competence: A Mixed Approach

New Search
New Search
Print Abstract
Print Abstract
E-mail Abstract
E-mail Abstract
Full Text
Full Text
Add To Collection
Save to My Collections
Export Citation
Export Citation

Wang, C.I., Peng, H. & Lu, W.H. (2006). A Framework for the Assessing of Intercultural Communicative Competence: A Mixed Approach. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006 (pp. 2977-2984). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/23428.

OpenURL Link

Conference Information

EDMEDIA

World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (EDMEDIA) 2006
June 2006
ISBN 1-880094-60-6
  Elaine Pearson & Paul Bohman
AACE

More Information on EDMEDIA

Table of Contents


Authors

Chao-I Wang, Hsinyi Peng, Institute of Education, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan; Wei-Hsin Lu, School of Information Sciences and Learning Technologies, University of Missouri-Columbia, United States

Abstract

The purposes of this study are (1) to identify the essential dimensions of intercultural communicative competence (or ICC, for short) and (2) to establish a mixed-approach framework that helps researchers assess the ICC of high school students and that includes a self-reporting questionnaire and a portfolio assessment. We also modify an instrument in such a way as to assess the ICC of high school students in Taiwan and the United States. A total of 472 high school students completed the Intercultural Communicative Competence Inventory (ICCI), which is a shortened version of Your Objectives, Guidelines, and Assessment form (YOGA) (Fantini, 2001). The ICCI shows sound reliability (Cronbach's £\ = .95) and construct validity, which appears similar to those of college students or of adult learners. We then discuss the process of question modification and of question validation, and their benefits for instructors and researchers. Lastly, we provide guides to, and examples of, alternative portfolio assessment and rubrics that help researchers to assess ICC-themed meta-awareness.

Keywords

Also Read

Tags

Comments & Discussion

Comment on the paper above. You must be registered to participate. Registration is free.




Feedback and Suggestions please email info@editlib.org.